 Add your name / see who's in!
|
#
|
Week of...
|
Links
|
Fall Semester
|
1
|
Sep 10
|
About, Tue, Thu
|
2
|
Sep 17
|
Tue, HW1, Thu
|
3
|
Sep 24
|
Tue, Photo, Thu
|
4
|
Oct 1
|
Questionnaire, Tue, HW2, Thu
|
5
|
Oct 8
|
Thanksgiving, Tue, Thu
|
6
|
Oct 15
|
Tue, HW3, Thu
|
7
|
Oct 22
|
Tue, Thu
|
8
|
Oct 29
|
Tue, HW4, Thu, Hilbert sphere
|
9
|
Nov 5
|
Tue,Thu, TE1
|
10
|
Nov 12
|
Tue, Thu
|
11
|
Nov 19
|
Tue, Thu, HW5
|
12
|
Nov 26
|
Tue, Thu
|
13
|
Dec 3
|
Tue, Thu, HW6
|
Spring Semester
|
14
|
Jan 7
|
Tue, Thu, HW7
|
15
|
Jan 14
|
Tue, Thu
|
16
|
Jan 21
|
Tue, Thu, HW8
|
17
|
Jan 28
|
Tue, Thu
|
18
|
Feb 4
|
Tue
|
19
|
Feb 11
|
TE2, Tue, HW9, Thu, Feb 17: last chance to drop class
|
R
|
Feb 18
|
Reading week
|
20
|
Feb 25
|
Tue, Thu, HW10
|
21
|
Mar 3
|
Tue, Thu
|
22
|
Mar 10
|
Tue, Thu, HW11
|
23
|
Mar 17
|
Tue, Thu
|
24
|
Mar 24
|
Tue, HW12, Thu
|
25
|
Mar 31
|
Referendum,Tue, Thu
|
26
|
Apr 7
|
Tue, Thu
|
R
|
Apr 14
|
Office hours
|
R
|
Apr 21
|
Office hours
|
F
|
Apr 28
|
Office hours, Final (Fri, May 2)
|
Register of Good Deeds
|
Errata to Bredon's Book
|
|
Announcements go here
Movie Time
With the word "immersion" in our minds, we watch the movie "Outside In". Also see the movie's home, a talk I once gave, and the movie itself, on google video.
Class Notes
The notes below are by the students and for the students. Hopefully they are useful, but they come with no guarantee of any kind.
During the previous class, we discussed immersions---smooth maps whose differentials are injective. This class deals with the dual notion of submersions, defined as follows:
Definition
Let
be a smooth map between manifolds. If for each
the differential
is surjective,
is called a submersion.
We had previously seen that immersions induce "nice" coordinate charts---ones where the immersion looks like the canonical inclusion
(where
). The proof of this theorem made use of the Inverse Function Theorem on a function defined on a chart of
. In the case of submersions, there is a similar theorem. Submersions locally look like the canonical projection
, and the proof of this fact makes use of the Inverse Function Theorem for a function define on a chart of
(duality!). However, before we can prove this theorem, we will need the following lemma.
Lemma
Let
and
be finite-dimensional vector spaces over
and let
be a surjective linear map. Then there exist bases
for
and
for
such that the matrix representative of
with respect to
and
is that of the canonical projection
.
Proof
Let
be any basis for
and choose
such that
for each
(this may be done since
is surjective). We claim that the set
is linearly independent. Suppose it were not. Then there would exist
with
and
for some
. But then
by linearity of
, contradicting the assumption that
is a basis.
Note that
. Hence we may find a basis
for
. Since
, the set
must be linearly independent and hence form a basis for
. We then have
, so that the matrix representative of
is
, which is the matrix representative of
. 
Theorem
If
is a smooth map between manifolds and for some
the differential
is surjective then there exist charts
and
on
and
, respectively, such that
-
-
- The diagram

commutes, where
is the canonical projection.
Proof
Since translations are diffeomorphisms of
for every
, it is trivial to find charts
and
such that
and
. Furthermore,
is open,
is open and
is continuous, so
is open and contains
. Hence, we may assume
without loss of generality.
Let
be the local representative of
and let
be the local representative of
. Since
is onto, we may apply the previous lemma to obtain a change of coordinates
such that
.
Let
. Then
is a chart because Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle T\!}
is a diffeomorphism. Let
be the corresponding local representative, define
by
, and let
be the differential of
at
. Then, by construction of
, we have that
and hence
, which is invertible. Hence, the Inverse Function Theorem gives the existence of non-empty open set
such that
is a diffeomorphism. Put
and
. Then
is a chart.
It remains to check that
, but this is clear: if
for some
, then
by definition of
. Hence,
and the proof is complete.