0708-1300/Class notes for Tuesday, September 25: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
Deadline September 30, 2007 to attend the Winter 2008 semester.
Deadline September 30, 2007 to attend the Winter 2008 semester.


==Class Notes - First hour==
Recall from last class we were proving the equivalence of the two definitions for a smooth manifold. The only nontrivial point that remained to be proved was that if we started with the definition of a manifold in the sense of functional structures and produced charts <math>\varphi,\psi</math> that these charts would satisfy the property of a manifold, defined in the atlas sense, that <math>\psi\circ\varphi^{-1}</math> is smooth where defined.

''Proof''

<math>\psi\circ\varphi^{-1}</math>:'''R'''<sup>''n''</sup><math>\rightarrow</math>'''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>
is smooth <math>\leftrightarrow</math> <math>(\psi\circ\varphi^{-1})_i</math>:'''R'''<sup>''n''</sup><math>\rightarrow</math>'''R''' is smooth <math>\forall</math> i
<math>\leftrightarrow</math> <math>\pi_i\circ\psi\circ\varphi^{-1}</math> is smooth where <math>\pi_i</math> is the <math>i^{th}</math> coordinate projection map.

Now, since <math>\pi_i</math> is always smooth, <math>\pi_i\in F_{R^{n}}(U^{'}_{\psi})</math>

But then we have <math>\pi_{i}\circ\psi\in F_{M}(U_{\psi})</math>
and so, by a property of functional structures,
<math>\pi_{i}\circ\psi |_{U_{\varphi}\bigcap U_{\psi}}\in F_{M}(U_{\varphi}\bigcap U_{\psi})</math>
and hence <math>\pi_{i}\circ\psi\circ\varphi^{-1}\in F_{R^{n}}</math> where it is defined and thus is smooth.
''QED''


'''Definition 1''' (induced structure)
Suppose <math>\pi:X\rightarrow Y</math> and suppose Y is equipped with a functional structure <math>F_Y</math> then the "induced functional structure" on X is

<math>F_{X}(U) = \{f:U\rightarrow R\ |\ \exists g\in F_{Y}(V)\ such\ that\ V\supset \pi(U)\ and\ f=g\circ\pi\}</math>

Claim: this does in fact define a functional structure on X


'''Definition 2'''
This is the reverse definition of that given directly above. Let <math>\pi:X\rightarrow Y</math> and let X be equipped with a functional structure <math>F_{X}</math>. Then we get a functional structure on Y by
<math>F_{Y}(V) = \{g:V\rightarrow R\ |\ g\circ\pi\in F_{X}(\pi^{-1}(V)\}
</math>
Claim: this does in fact define a functional structure on X


'''Example 1'''
Let <math>S^{2} = R^{3}-\{0\}/</math>~
where the equivalence relation ~ is given by x~<math>\alpha</math>x for <math>\alpha</math>>0
We thus get a canonical projection map <math>\pi:R^{3}-\{0\}\rightarrow S^{2}</math>
and hence, there is an induced functional structure on <math>S^{2}</math>.
Claim:
1) This induced functional structure makes <math>S^{2}</math> into a manifold
2) This resulting manifold is the ''same'' manifold as from the atlas definition given previously


'''Example 2'''
Consider the torus thought of as <math>T^{2} = R^{2}/Z^{2}</math>, i.e., the real plane with the equivalence relation that (x,y)~(x+n,y+m) for (x,y) in <math>R^{2}</math>and (n,m) in <math>Z^{2}</math>

As in the previous example, the torus inherits a functional structure from the real plane we must again check that
1) We get a manifold
2) This is the ''same'' manifold as we had previously with the atlas definition


'''Example 3'''
Let <math>CP^{n}</math> denote the n dimensional complex projective space, that is,
<math>CP^{n} = C^{n+1}-\{0\}/</math>~ where <math>[z_{0},...,z_{n}]</math>
~ <math>[\alpha z_{0},...,\alpha z_{n}]</math>
where <math>\alpha\in C</math>

Again, this space inherits a functional structure from <math>C^{n+1}</math> and we again need to claim that this yields a manifold.

''Proof of Claim''

We consider the subsets <math>CP^{n}\supset U_{i} = \{[z_{0},...,z_{n}]\ |\ z_{i}\neq 0\}</math> for <math>0\leq i \leq n</math>

Clearly <math>\bigcup U_{i} = CP^{n}</math>

Now, for each <math>p\in U_{i}</math> there is a unique representative for its equivalence class of the form <math>[z_{0},...,1,...,z_{n}]</math> where the 1 is at the ith location.

We thus can get a map from <math>\varphi_{i}:U_{i}\rightarrow C^{n} = R^{2n}</math> by
<math>p\mapsto [z_{0}/z_{i},...,z_{i-1}/z_{i},z_{i+1}/z_{i},...,z_{n}/z_{i}]</math>
Hence we have shown (loosely) that our functional structure is locally isormophic to <math>(R,C^\infty)</math>


'''Definition 3''' Product Manifolds

Suppose <math>M^{m}</math> and <math>N^{n}</math> are manifolds. Then the product manifold, on the set MxN has an atlas given by
<math>\{\varphi \times \psi: U\times V\rightarrow U'\times V'\in R^{m}\times R^{n}\ | \varphi: U\rightarrow U'\subset R^{m}\ and\ \psi:V\rightarrow V'\subset R^{n}</math> are charts in resp. manifolds}

Claim: This does in fact yield a manifold


'''Example 4'''
It can be checked that <math>T^{2} = S^{1}\times S^{1}</math> gives the torus a manifold structure, by the product manifold, that is indeed the same as the normal structure given previously.

Revision as of 12:31, 25 September 2007

Announcements go here

Dror's Notes

  • Class photo is on Thursday, show up and be at your best! More seriously -
    • The class photo is of course not mandatory, and if you are afraid of google learning about you, you should not be in it.
    • If you want to be in the photo but can't make it on Thursday, I'll take a picture of you some other time and add it as an inset to the main picture.
  • I just got the following email message, which some of you may find interesting:
NSERC - CMS Math in Moscow Scholarships

The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and the
Canadian Mathematical Society (CMS) support scholarships at $9,000
each. Canadian students registered in a mathematics or computer
science program are eligible.

The scholarships are to attend a semester at the small elite Moscow
Independent University.

Math in Moscow program
www.mccme.ru/mathinmoscow/
Application details
www.cms.math.ca/bulletins/Moscow_web/

For additional information please see your department or call the CMS
at 613-562-5702.

Deadline September 30, 2007 to attend the Winter 2008 semester.


Class Notes - First hour

Recall from last class we were proving the equivalence of the two definitions for a smooth manifold. The only nontrivial point that remained to be proved was that if we started with the definition of a manifold in the sense of functional structures and produced charts that these charts would satisfy the property of a manifold, defined in the atlas sense, that is smooth where defined.

Proof

:RnRn is smooth :RnR is smooth i is smooth where is the coordinate projection map.

Now, since is always smooth,

But then we have and so, by a property of functional structures, and hence where it is defined and thus is smooth. QED


Definition 1 (induced structure) Suppose and suppose Y is equipped with a functional structure then the "induced functional structure" on X is

Claim: this does in fact define a functional structure on X


Definition 2 This is the reverse definition of that given directly above. Let and let X be equipped with a functional structure . Then we get a functional structure on Y by Claim: this does in fact define a functional structure on X


Example 1 Let ~ where the equivalence relation ~ is given by x~x for >0 We thus get a canonical projection map and hence, there is an induced functional structure on . Claim: 1) This induced functional structure makes into a manifold 2) This resulting manifold is the same manifold as from the atlas definition given previously


Example 2 Consider the torus thought of as , i.e., the real plane with the equivalence relation that (x,y)~(x+n,y+m) for (x,y) in and (n,m) in

As in the previous example, the torus inherits a functional structure from the real plane we must again check that 1) We get a manifold 2) This is the same manifold as we had previously with the atlas definition


Example 3 Let denote the n dimensional complex projective space, that is, ~ where ~ where

Again, this space inherits a functional structure from and we again need to claim that this yields a manifold.

Proof of Claim

We consider the subsets for

Clearly

Now, for each there is a unique representative for its equivalence class of the form where the 1 is at the ith location.

We thus can get a map from by Hence we have shown (loosely) that our functional structure is locally isormophic to


Definition 3 Product Manifolds

Suppose and are manifolds. Then the product manifold, on the set MxN has an atlas given by are charts in resp. manifolds}

Claim: This does in fact yield a manifold


Example 4 It can be checked that gives the torus a manifold structure, by the product manifold, that is indeed the same as the normal structure given previously.