#
|
Week of...
|
Notes and Links
|
1
|
Jan 6
|
About This Class (PDF).
Monday: Course introduction, knots and Reidemeister moves, knot colourings. Tricolourability without Diagrams
Wednesday: The Gauss linking number combinatorially and as an integral.
Friday: The Schroedinger equation and path integrals. Friday Introduction (the quantum pendulum)
|
2
|
Jan 13
|
Homework Assignment 1.
Monday: The Kauffman bracket and the Jones polynomial.
Wednesday: Self-linking using swaddling.
Friday: Euler-Lagrange problems, Gaussian integration, volumes of spheres.
|
3
|
Jan 20
|
Homework Assignment 2.
Monday: The definition of finite-type and some examples.
Wednesday: The self-linking number and framings.
Friday: Integrating a polynomial times a Gaussian. Class Photo.
|
4
|
Jan 27
|
Homework Assignment 3.
Monday: Chord diagrams and weight systems.
Wednesday: Swaddling maps and framings, general configuration space integrals.
Friday: Some analysis of .
|
5
|
Feb 3
|
Homework Assignment 4.
Monday: 4T, the Fundamental Theorem and universal finite type invariants. The Fulton-MacPherson Compactification (PDF).
Wednesday: The Fulton-MacPherson Compactification, Part I.
Friday: More on pushforwards, , and .
|
6
|
Feb 10
|
Homework Assignment 5.
Monday: The bracket-rise theorem and the invariance principle.
Wednesday: The Fulton-MacPherson Compactification, Part II.
Friday: Gauge fixing, the beginning of Feynman diagrams.
|
R
|
Feb 17
|
Reading Week.
|
7
|
Feb 24
|
Monday: A review of Lie algebras.
Wednesday: Graph cohomology and .
Friday: More on Feynman diagrams, beginning of gauge theory. From Gaussian Integration to Feynman Diagrams (PDF).
|
8
|
Mar 3
|
Homework Assignment 6 (PDF)
Monday: Lie algebraic weight systems.
Wednesday: Graph cohomology and the construction of . Graph Cohomology and Configuration Space Integrals (PDF)
Friday: Gauge invariance, Chern-Simons, holonomies. Mar 9 is the last day to drop this class.
|
9
|
Mar 10
|
Homework Assignment 7 (PDF)
Monday: The weight system.
Wednesday: The universal property, hidden faces.
Friday: Insolubility of the quintic, naive expectations for CS perturbation theory.
|
10
|
Mar 17
|
Homework Assignment 8 (PDF)
Monday: and PBW.
Wednesday: The anomaly.
Friday: Faddeev-Popov, part I. Gaussian Integration, Determinants, Feynman Diagrams (PDF).
|
11
|
Mar 24
|
Homework Assignment 9 (PDF)
Monday: is a bi-algebra.
Wednesday: Understanding and fixing the anomaly. Friday: class cancelled.
|
12
|
Mar 31
|
Monday, Wednesday: class cancelled.
Friday: A Monday class: back to expansions.
|
E
|
Apr 7
|
Monday: A Friday class on what we mostly didn't have time to do.
|
 Add your name / see who's in!
|
Dror's Notebook
|
|
|
Here are some thoughts on how to define tricolourability without choosing a diagram.
Another place in which arcs of a diagram come up naturally is in the Wirtinger presentation for the fundamental group of the knot complement. Here is how the presentation is defined: each arc of the knot diagram corresponds with a generator, and each crossing corresponds with a relation between the generators of the incident arcs of the form
where
is the generator corresponding with the overcrossing.
Now if
is a Wirtinger presentation for a knot diagram, it's natural to think of a tricolouring as a map
. We'd like to try to extend this to a group homomorphism
. This works if target group has the relation
along with all other relations obtained by permuting
. These relations fix the target group as
.
Thus, we've associated with each tricolouring a homomorphism from the fundamental group of the knot complement to
. Not every such homomorphism gives a tricolouring; for example, take the trivial homomorphism. I believe that the following is a sufficient condition for a homomorphism
to give a tricolouring: for every element
in
whose representative as a loop in
has odd linking number with
,
is an order 2 element in
. Hence, we can define tricolourings as certain kinds of homomorphisms from
to
without having to choose a diagram.