09-240/Classnotes for Tuesday September 15: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 159: Line 159:
<u>Proof</u>:
<u>Proof</u>:


Given a finite set with <math>m</math> elements in <math>\mathbb Z</math>, an element <math>a</math> will have a multiplicative inverse '''iff''' gcd(a,m) = 1
Given a finite set with <math>m</math> elements in <math>\mathbb Z</math>, an element <math>a</math> will have a multiplicative inverse '''iff''' <math>gcd(a,m) = 1</math>


This can be shown using [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zout%27s_identity Bézout's identity]:
This can be shown using [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zout%27s_identity Bézout's identity]:
Line 168: Line 168:
: <math>x = a^{-1}</math>
: <math>x = a^{-1}</math>


We have shown that <math>a</math> has a multiplicative inverse if <math>a</math> and <math>m</math> are relatively prime. It is therefore a natural conclusion that if <math>m</math> is prime all elements in the set will satisfy gcd(a, m) = 1
We have shown that <math>a</math> has a multiplicative inverse if <math>a</math> and <math>m</math> are relatively prime. It is therefore a natural conclusion that if <math>m</math> is prime all elements in the set will satisfy <math>gcd(a, m) = 1</math>


----
----

Revision as of 14:47, 16 September 2009

The real numbers A set with two binary operators and two special elements s.t.

Note: or means inclusive or in math.

Definition: A field is a set F with two binary operators : F×FF, : F×FF and two elements s.t.

Examples

  1. is not a field because not every element has a multiplicative inverse.
    Let
    Then
    Therefore F4 fails; there is no number b in F6 s.t. a · b = 1
Ex. 4
+ 0 1
0 0 1
1 1 0
Ex. 4
× 0 1
0 0 0
1 0 1
Ex. 5
+ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 0
2 2 3 4 5 6 0 1
3 3 4 5 6 0 1 2
4 4 5 6 0 1 2 3
5 5 6 0 1 2 3 4
6 6 0 1 2 3 4 5
Ex. 5
× 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
2 0 2 4 6 1 3 5
3 0 3 6 2 5 1 4
4 0 4 1 5 2 6 3
5 0 5 3 1 6 4 2
6 0 6 5 4 3 2 1

Theorem: F2 is a field.

In order to prove that the associative property holds, make a table (similar to a truth table) for a, b and c.

a b c  
0 0 0  
0 0 1  
0 1 0  
0 1 1 (0 + 1) + 1 =? 0 + (1 + 1)
1 + 1 =? 0 + 0
0 = 0
1 0 0  
1 0 1  
1 1 0  
1 1 1  


Theorem: for is a field iff (if and only if) is a prime number

Proof:

Given a finite set with elements in , an element will have a multiplicative inverse iff

This can be shown using Bézout's identity:

We have shown that has a multiplicative inverse if and are relatively prime. It is therefore a natural conclusion that if is prime all elements in the set will satisfy


Multiplication is repeated addition.

One may interpret this as counting the units in a 23×27 rectangle; one may choose to count along either 23 rows or 27 columns, but both ways lead to the same answer.


Exponentiation is repeated multiplication, but it does not have the same properties as multiplication; 23 = 8, but 32 = 9.

Tedious Theorem

  1. "cancellation property"
    Proof:
    By F4,
    by F2
    by choice of d
    by F3
  2. Proof:
    by F3
    by adding the additive inverse of a to both sides
  3. Proof:
    by F3
    by F5
  4. So there is no 0−1
  5. (Bonus)

Quotation of the Day

......