|
|
Line 158: |
Line 158: |
|
|
|
|
|
<u>Proof</u>: |
|
<u>Proof</u>: |
|
|
|
|
Given a finite set with <math>m</math> elements in <math>\mathbb Z</math>, an element <math>a</math> will have a multiplicative inverse '''iff''' gcd(a,m) = 1 |
|
Given a finite set with <math>m</math> elements in <math>\mathbb Z</math>, an element <math>a</math> will have a multiplicative inverse '''iff''' gcd(a,m) = 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
This can be shown using [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zout%27s_identity Bézout's identity]: |
|
This can be shown using [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zout%27s_identity Bézout's identity]: |
|
|
|
|
|
<math>\exists x, y s.t. ax + my = 1</math> |
|
: <math>\exists x, y \mbox{s.t.} ax + my = 1</math> |
|
<math>(ax + my) \mod m = 1 \mod m</math> |
|
: <math>(ax + my) \bmod{m} = 1\bmod{m}</math> |
|
<math>ax = 1 \therefore x = a^(-1)</math> |
|
: <math>ax = 1</math> |
|
|
: <math>x = a^{-1}</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
We have shown that <math>a</math> has a multiplicative inverse if <math>a</math> and <math>m</math> are relatively prime. It is therefore a natural conclusion that if <math>m</math> is prime all elements in the set will satisfy gcd(a, m) = 1 |
|
We have shown that <math>a</math> has a multiplicative inverse if <math>a</math> and <math>m</math> are relatively prime. It is therefore a natural conclusion that if <math>m</math> is prime all elements in the set will satisfy gcd(a, m) = 1 |
Revision as of 14:30, 16 September 2009
Additions to the MAT 240 web site no longer count towards good deed points
|
#
|
Week of...
|
Notes and Links
|
1
|
Sep 7
|
Tue, About, Thu
|
2
|
Sep 14
|
Tue, HW1, HW1 Solution, Thu
|
3
|
Sep 21
|
Tue, HW2, HW2 Solution, Thu, Photo
|
4
|
Sep 28
|
Tue, HW3, HW3 Solution, Thu
|
5
|
Oct 5
|
Tue, HW4, HW4 Solution, Thu,
|
6
|
Oct 12
|
Tue, Thu
|
7
|
Oct 19
|
Tue, HW5, HW5 Solution, Term Test on Thu
|
8
|
Oct 26
|
Tue, Why LinAlg?, HW6, HW6 Solution, Thu
|
9
|
Nov 2
|
Tue, MIT LinAlg, Thu
|
10
|
Nov 9
|
Tue, HW7, HW7 Solution Thu
|
11
|
Nov 16
|
Tue, HW8, HW8 Solution, Thu
|
12
|
Nov 23
|
Tue, HW9, HW9 Solution, Thu
|
13
|
Nov 30
|
Tue, On the final, Thu
|
S
|
Dec 7
|
Office Hours
|
F
|
Dec 14
|
Final on Dec 16
|
To Do List
|
The Algebra Song!
|
Register of Good Deeds
|
Misplaced Material
|
Add your name / see who's in!
|
|
The real numbers A set with two binary operators and two special elements s.t.
- Note: or means inclusive or in math.
Definition: A field is a set F with two binary operators : F×F → F, : F×F → F and two elements s.t.
Examples
-
- is not a field because not every element has a multiplicative inverse.
- Let
- Then
- Therefore F4 fails; there is no number b in F6 s.t. a · b = 1
|
|
Ex. 5
+ |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6
|
0
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6
|
1
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
0
|
2
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
0 |
1
|
3
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
2
|
4
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3
|
5
|
5 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4
|
6
|
6 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5
|
|
Ex. 5
× |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6
|
0
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0
|
1
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6
|
2
|
0 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
5
|
3
|
0 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
4
|
4
|
0 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
6 |
3
|
5
|
0 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
2
|
6
|
0 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1
|
|
Theorem: F2 is a field.
In order to prove that the associative property holds, make a table (similar to a truth table) for a, b and c.
a |
b |
c |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
(0 + 1) + 1 =? 0 + (1 + 1) 1 + 1 =? 0 + 0 0 = 0
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Theorem: for is a field iff (if and only if) is a prime number
Proof:
Given a finite set with elements in , an element will have a multiplicative inverse iff gcd(a,m) = 1
This can be shown using Bézout's identity:
We have shown that has a multiplicative inverse if and are relatively prime. It is therefore a natural conclusion that if is prime all elements in the set will satisfy gcd(a, m) = 1
Multiplication is repeated addition.
One may interpret this as counting the units in a 23×27 rectangle; one may choose to count along either 23 rows or 27 columns, but both ways lead to the same answer.
Exponentiation is repeated multiplication, but it does not have the same properties as multiplication; 23 = 8, but 32 = 9.
Tedious Theorem
- "cancellation property"
- Proof:
- By F4,
- by F2
- by choice of d
- by F3
-
- Proof:
- by F3
- by adding the additive inverse of a to both sides
-
-
- Proof:
- by F3
- by F5
-
- So there is no 0−1
- (Bonus)
Quotation of the Day
......