#
|
Week of...
|
Links
|
1
|
Sep 11
|
About, Tue, Thu
|
2
|
Sep 18
|
Tue, Kurlin(P), Thu
|
3
|
Sep 25
|
Tue, Photo, Thu
|
4
|
Oct 2
|
HW1, Tue, Thu
|
5
|
Oct 9
|
Tue(P), Thu(P)
|
6
|
Oct 16
|
HW2, Tue(P), Thu(P)
|
7
|
Oct 23
|
Tue(P), Thu
|
8
|
Oct 30
|
HW3, Tue, Thu
|
9
|
Nov 6
|
Tue ( ), Thu
|
10
|
Nov 13
|
Tue, Thu
|
11
|
Nov 20
|
HW4(P), Thu
|
12
|
Nov 27
|
Thu
|
13
|
Dec 4
|
Syzygies in Asymptote, Final
|
|
Jan 8
|
Grades
|
Note. (P) means "contains a problem that Dror cares about".
|
 Add your name / see who's in!
|
On to 07-1352
|
|
Question 1. Can you embed a trinion (a.k.a. a sphere with three holes, a pair of pants, or a band theta graph) in
so that each boundary component would be unknotted yet each pair of boundary components would be knotted? How about, so that at least one pair of boundary components would be knotted?
Question 2. Suppose two trinions
and
are knotted so that the pushforwards
and
are equal for any link
which is "drawn" on the parameter space
of
and
. Does it follow that
and
are equivalent?
Question 3. A trinion
is embedded in
so that its boundary is the trivial 3-component link. Does it follow that
is trivial?
Question 4. A trinion
is embedded in
so that its "strapped boundary" is equivalent to the strapped boundary of the trivially embedded trinion. Does it follow that
is trivial?
The standardly embedded strapped trinion