06-1350/Grades: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 42: Line 42:
==Good Deeds==
==Good Deeds==


The good deeds were public and so are the points awarded to them.
The good deeds were public and so are the points awarded to them. (Note that work related to [[06-1350/Homework Assignment 4|HW4]] is given credit under homework, not here).


{| align=left border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=3
{| align=left border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=3
Line 51: Line 51:
!All contributions
!All contributions
!Points
!Points
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=Zak|name=Zavosh Amir-Khosravi|deeds=}}
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=Zak|name=Zavosh Amir-Khosravi|deeds=Fixed one typo}}
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=Omar|name=Omar Antolin Camarena|deeds=}}
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=Omar|name=Omar Antolin Camarena|deeds=Proved that the obstruction group related to the construction of <math>e^x</math> vanishes (but did not write his proof!).}}
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=Jana|name=Jana Archibald|deeds=}}
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=Jana|name=Jana Archibald|deeds=&nbsp;-}}
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=Bailey|name=Michael Baily|deeds=}}
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=Bailey|name=Michael Baily|deeds=&nbsp;-}}
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=Karene|name=Karene Chu|deeds=}}
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=Karenechu|name=Karene Chu|deeds=&nbsp;-}}
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=?|name=Andrew Critch|deeds=}}
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=?|name=Andrew Critch|deeds=}}
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=Zsuzsi|name=Zsuzsi Dancso|deeds=}}
{{06-1350/Good Deeds|points=|uid=Zsuzsi|name=Zsuzsi Dancso|deeds=}}

Revision as of 11:42, 8 January 2007

In Preparation

The information below is preliminary and cannot be trusted! (v)

Grading the Homework Assignments

I have graded the homework assignments very loosely and without too much attention to detail, on a scale from 0 to 100.

  • In HW1, each of the 4 questions was worth 25 points and the "hard and not mandatory" part of problem 1 was worth up to 20 "bonus" points.
  • In HW2, the first two questions were worth 30 points each and the third was worth 40 points.
  • In HW3 each part was worth approximately 20 points, but I graded the whole assignment as one unit without giving grades to the individual parts.

Grading the Final

I have used the following key in grading the final exam:

Question Grade Total Grade Meaning
34 102 Your essay(s) is/are worthy of publication (very rare)
32 96 Your essay(s) is/are worthy of weblication (rare)
30 90 Your essay(s) indicated solid understanding of the material, but there is no reason for anyone other than you and me to read them (most common)
28 84 Your essay(s) indicated some understanding of the material, but also some gaps
26 78 You've studied for the exam and thought about the material, but not enough

Good Deeds

The good deeds were public and so are the points awarded to them. (Note that work related to HW4 is given credit under homework, not here).

Name User id Deed or deeds All contributions Points
Zavosh Amir-Khosravi Zak Fixed one typo show
Omar Antolin Camarena Omar Proved that the obstruction group related to the construction of vanishes (but did not write his proof!). show
Jana Archibald Jana  - show
Michael Baily Bailey  - show
Karene Chu Karenechu  - show
Andrew Critch ? show
Zsuzsi Dancso Zsuzsi show
Michael de Jong michael show
Andy Hammerlindl Andy show
Oleg Ivrii Oivrii show
Louis Leung ? show
Fionntan Roukema Roukema show
Siddarth Sankaran Sankaran show
Kristin Shaw Shaw show