06-1350/Class Notes for Tuesday October 10: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{06-1350/Navigation}} |
{{06-1350/Navigation}} |
||
==Some Questions== |
|||
[[Image:PlasticTrinions.jpg|thumb|left|150px|Plastic trinions]] |
[[Image:PlasticTrinions.jpg|thumb|left|150px|Plastic trinions]] |
||
Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
'''Dror's Speculation.''' I'm clueless. |
'''Dror's Speculation.''' I'm clueless. |
||
⚫ | |||
'''Question 4.''' A trinion <math>\gamma</math> is embedded in <math>{\mathbb R}^3</math> so that its "strapped boundary" is equivalent to the strapped boundary of the trivially embedded trinion. Does it follow that <math>\gamma</math> is trivial? |
'''Question 4.''' A trinion <math>\gamma</math> is embedded in <math>{\mathbb R}^3</math> so that its "strapped boundary" is equivalent to the strapped boundary of the trivially embedded trinion. Does it follow that <math>\gamma</math> is trivial? |
||
Line 18: | Line 22: | ||
'''Dror's Speculation.''' If yes, it will have terrific consequences. If no, it will explain some of the misery we encounter when we deal with "associators". I would really like to understand this one. |
'''Dror's Speculation.''' If yes, it will have terrific consequences. If no, it will explain some of the misery we encounter when we deal with "associators". I would really like to understand this one. |
||
==Some Computations== |
|||
⚫ | |||
The following table (taken from {{ref|Bar-Natan_95}} and {{ref|Kneissler_97}}) shows the number of type <math>m</math> invariants of knots and framed knots modulo type <math>m-1</math> invariants (<math>\dim{\mathcal A}_m^r</math> and <math>\dim{\mathcal A}_m</math>) and the number of multiplicative generators of the algebra <math>{\mathcal A}</math> in degree <math>m</math> (<math>\dim{\mathcal P}_m</math>) for <math>m\leq 12</math>. Some further tabulated results are in {{ref|Bar-Natan_96}}. |
|||
{|align=center border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=4 |
|||
|- align=right |
|||
|align=center|m |
|||
|0 |
|||
|1 |
|||
|2 |
|||
|3 |
|||
|4 |
|||
|5 |
|||
|6 |
|||
|7 |
|||
|8 |
|||
|9 |
|||
|10 |
|||
|11 |
|||
|12 |
|||
|- align=right |
|||
|align=center|<math>\dim{\mathcal A}_m^r</math> |
|||
|1 |
|||
|0 |
|||
|1 |
|||
|1 |
|||
|3 |
|||
|4 |
|||
|9 |
|||
|14 |
|||
|27 |
|||
|44 |
|||
|80 |
|||
|132 |
|||
|232 |
|||
|- align=right |
|||
|align=center|<math>\dim{\mathcal A}_m</math> |
|||
|1 |
|||
|1 |
|||
|2 |
|||
|3 |
|||
|6 |
|||
|10 |
|||
|19 |
|||
|33 |
|||
|60 |
|||
|104 |
|||
|184 |
|||
|316 |
|||
|548 |
|||
|- align=right |
|||
|align=center|<math>\dim{\mathcal P}_m</math> |
|||
|0 |
|||
|1 |
|||
|1 |
|||
|1 |
|||
|2 |
|||
|3 |
|||
|5 |
|||
|8 |
|||
|12 |
|||
|18 |
|||
|27 |
|||
|39 |
|||
|55 |
|||
|} |
|||
==Some Bounds== |
|||
Little is known about these dimensions for large <math>m</math>. There is an explicit conjecture |
|||
in {{ref|Broadhurst_97}} but no progress has been made in the direction of proving or disproving it. The best asymptotic bounds available are: |
|||
'''Theorem.''' For large <math>m</math>, <math>\dim{\mathcal P}_m>e^{c\sqrt m}</math> (for any fixed <math>c<\pi\sqrt{\frac23}</math>, see {{ref|Dasbach_00}}, {{ref|Kontsevich_93}}) and <math>\dim{\mathcal A}_m<6^mm!\sqrt{m}/\pi^{2m}</math> ({{ref|Stoimenow_98}}, {{ref|Zagier_01}}). |
|||
==Some References== |
|||
{{note|Bar-Natan_95}} D. Bar-Natan, ''On the Vassiliev knot invariants,'' Topology '''34''' (1995) 423-472. |
|||
{{note|Bar-Natan_96}} D. Bar-Natan, ''Some computations related to Vassiliev invariants,'' electronic publication, <tt>http://www.math.toronto.edu/~drorbn/LOP.html#Computations</tt>. |
|||
{{note|Broadhurst_97}} D. J. Broadhurst, ''Conjectured enumeration of Vassiliev invariants,'' preprint, September 1997, {{arXiv|q-alg/9709031}}. |
|||
{{note|Dasbach_00}} O. T. Dasbach, ''On the combinatorial structure of primitive Vassiliev invariants III - a lower bound,'' Comm. in Cont. Math. '''2-4''' (2000) 579-590, {{arXiv|math.GT/9806086}}. |
|||
{{note|Kneissler_97}} J. A. Kneissler, ''The number of primitive Vassiliev invariants up to degree twelve,'' preprint, June 1997, {{arXiv|q-alg/9706022}}. |
|||
{{note|Kontsevich_93}} M. Kontsevich, ''Vassiliev's knot invariants,'' Adv. in Sov. Math., '''16(2)''' (1993) 137-150. |
|||
{{note|Stoimenow_98}} A. Stoimenow, ''Enumeration of chord diagrams and an upper bound for Vassiliev invariants,'' Jour. of Knot Theory and its Ramifications '''7(1)''' (1998) 94-114. |
|||
{{note|Zagier_01}} D. Zagier, ''Vassiliev invariants and a strange identity related to the Dedekind eta-function,'' Topology '''40(5)''' (2001) 945-960. |
Revision as of 07:34, 10 October 2006
|
Some Questions
Question 1. Can you embed a trinion (a.k.a. a sphere with three holes, a pair of pants, or a band theta graph) in so that each boundary component would be unknotted yet each pair of boundary components would be knotted? How about, so that at least one pair of boundary components would be knotted?
Dror's Speculation. Yes and yes.
Question 2. A trinion is embedded in so that its boundary is the trivial 3-component link. Does it follow that is trivial?
Dror's Speculation. No.
Question 3. Suppose two trinions and are knotted so that the pushforwards and are equal for any link which is "drawn" on the parameter space of and . Does it follow that and are equivalent?
Dror's Speculation. I'm clueless.
Question 4. A trinion is embedded in so that its "strapped boundary" is equivalent to the strapped boundary of the trivially embedded trinion. Does it follow that is trivial?
Dror's Speculation. If yes, it will have terrific consequences. If no, it will explain some of the misery we encounter when we deal with "associators". I would really like to understand this one.
Some Computations
The following table (taken from [Bar-Natan_95] and [Kneissler_97]) shows the number of type invariants of knots and framed knots modulo type invariants ( and ) and the number of multiplicative generators of the algebra in degree () for . Some further tabulated results are in [Bar-Natan_96].
m | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 14 | 27 | 44 | 80 | 132 | 232 | |
1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 19 | 33 | 60 | 104 | 184 | 316 | 548 | |
0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 27 | 39 | 55 |
Some Bounds
Little is known about these dimensions for large . There is an explicit conjecture in [Broadhurst_97] but no progress has been made in the direction of proving or disproving it. The best asymptotic bounds available are:
Theorem. For large , (for any fixed , see [Dasbach_00], [Kontsevich_93]) and ([Stoimenow_98], [Zagier_01]).
Some References
[Bar-Natan_95] ^ D. Bar-Natan, On the Vassiliev knot invariants, Topology 34 (1995) 423-472.
[Bar-Natan_96] ^ D. Bar-Natan, Some computations related to Vassiliev invariants, electronic publication, http://www.math.toronto.edu/~drorbn/LOP.html#Computations.
[Broadhurst_97] ^ D. J. Broadhurst, Conjectured enumeration of Vassiliev invariants, preprint, September 1997, arXiv:q-alg/9709031.
[Dasbach_00] ^ O. T. Dasbach, On the combinatorial structure of primitive Vassiliev invariants III - a lower bound, Comm. in Cont. Math. 2-4 (2000) 579-590, arXiv:math.GT/9806086.
[Kneissler_97] ^ J. A. Kneissler, The number of primitive Vassiliev invariants up to degree twelve, preprint, June 1997, arXiv:q-alg/9706022.
[Kontsevich_93] ^ M. Kontsevich, Vassiliev's knot invariants, Adv. in Sov. Math., 16(2) (1993) 137-150.
[Stoimenow_98] ^ A. Stoimenow, Enumeration of chord diagrams and an upper bound for Vassiliev invariants, Jour. of Knot Theory and its Ramifications 7(1) (1998) 94-114.
[Zagier_01] ^ D. Zagier, Vassiliev invariants and a strange identity related to the Dedekind eta-function, Topology 40(5) (2001) 945-960.