10-327/Homework Assignment 6: Difference between revisions
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Why in problem 5 it says that the cardinality of a set is less or equal to another set so that the cardinality are the same? |
Why in problem 5 it says that the cardinality of a set is less or equal to another set so that the cardinality are the same? |
||
[[User:Xwbdsb|Xwbdsb]] 00:25, 13 November 2010 (EST) |
[[User:Xwbdsb|Xwbdsb]] 00:25, 13 November 2010 (EST) |
||
Also I am wondering what is the super-limit because it wasn't done in class and it is not covered in the book too??[[User:Xwbdsb|Xwbdsb]] 00:36, 13 November 2010 (EST) |
|||
I remember that when proving the homeomorphism in question 2 there is another intricate argument for continuity that is |
|||
not the standard definition in our topology class? Sorry Dror I am sort of lost of what to do for this assignment...[[User:Xwbdsb|Xwbdsb]] 00:36, 13 November 2010 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 00:36, 13 November 2010
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reading
Read sections 37-38 in Munkres' textbook (Topology, 2nd edition). Remember that reading math isn't like reading a novel! If you read a novel and miss a few details most likely you'll still understand the novel. But if you miss a few details in a math text, often you'll miss everything that follows. So reading math takes reading and rereading and rerereading and a lot of thought about what you've read. Also, preread sections 30-33, just to get a feel for the future.
Doing
Solve and submit the following problems.
Problem 1. Problem 1 on page 235 of Munkres' book.
Problem 2. Show that [math]\displaystyle{ \{0,1\}^{\mathbb N} }[/math] is homeomorphic to the cantor set [math]\displaystyle{ C }[/math].
Problem 3. Show that any function [math]\displaystyle{ f\colon{\mathbb N}\to I^A }[/math] from the integers into a "cube" [math]\displaystyle{ I^A=[0,1]^A }[/math] has a unique continuous extension to [math]\displaystyle{ \beta{\mathbb N} }[/math].
Problem 4. Use the fact that there is a countable dense subset within [math]\displaystyle{ I^I }[/math] to show that the cardinality of [math]\displaystyle{ \beta{\mathbb N} }[/math] is greater than or equal to the cardinality of [math]\displaystyle{ I^I }[/math].
Problem 5. Show that the cardinality of [math]\displaystyle{ \beta{\mathbb N} }[/math] is also less than or equal to the cardinality of [math]\displaystyle{ I^I }[/math], and therefore it is equal to the cardinality of [math]\displaystyle{ I^I }[/math].
Problem 6. Show that if [math]\displaystyle{ \mu\in\beta{\mathbb N}\backslash{\mathbb N} }[/math] and if [math]\displaystyle{ \mbox{Lim}_\mu }[/math] is the corresponding generalized limit, and if [math]\displaystyle{ b }[/math] is a bounded sequence and [math]\displaystyle{ f\colon{\mathbb R}\to{\mathbb R} }[/math] is a continuous function, then [math]\displaystyle{ \mbox{Lim}_\mu f(b_k) = f(\mbox{Lim}_\mu b_k) }[/math].
Problem 7. Show that there is no super-limit function [math]\displaystyle{ \mbox{SuperLim} }[/math] defined on bounded sequences of reals with values in the reals which has the following 3 properties:
- [math]\displaystyle{ \mbox{SuperLim}(a_k+b_k) = \mbox{SuperLim}(a_k) + \mbox{SuperLim}(b_k) }[/math].
- [math]\displaystyle{ \mbox{SuperLim}(a_k\cdot b_k) = \mbox{SuperLim}(a_k) \cdot \mbox{SuperLim}(b_k) }[/math].
- [math]\displaystyle{ \mbox{SuperLim}(a'_k) = \mbox{SuperLim}(a_k) }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ a' }[/math] is [math]\displaystyle{ a }[/math] "shifted once": [math]\displaystyle{ a'_k=a_{k+1} }[/math].
Due date
This assignment is due at the end of class on Thursday, November 18, 2010.
| Dror's notes above / Student's notes below |
Hi Dror, how do we prove some set has smaller cardinality to another set? I mean what do you mean by that? Why in problem 5 it says that the cardinality of a set is less or equal to another set so that the cardinality are the same? Xwbdsb 00:25, 13 November 2010 (EST)
Also I am wondering what is the super-limit because it wasn't done in class and it is not covered in the book too??Xwbdsb 00:36, 13 November 2010 (EST) I remember that when proving the homeomorphism in question 2 there is another intricate argument for continuity that is not the standard definition in our topology class? Sorry Dror I am sort of lost of what to do for this assignment...Xwbdsb 00:36, 13 November 2010 (EST)