14-240/Tutorial-October7: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 25: Line 25:
:Case 1: <math>x + y \in W_1</math>:
:Case 1: <math>x + y \in W_1</math>:


::Since <math>x \in W_1 \cup W_2</math> and <math>W_1 \cup W_2</math> has additive inverses, then <math>(-x) \in W_1 \cup W_2</math>.
::Since <math>x \in W_1</math> and <math>W_1</math> has additive inverses, then <math>(-x) \in W_1</math>.


::Then <math>(x+y)+(-x)=y \in W_1</math>.
::Then <math>(x+y)+(-x)=y \in W_1</math>.
Line 31: Line 31:
:Case 2: <math>x + y \in W_2</math>:
:Case 2: <math>x + y \in W_2</math>:


::Since <math>y \in W_1 \cup W_2</math> and <math>W_1 \cup W_2</math> has additive inverses, then <math>(-y) \in W_1 \cup W_2</math>.
::Since <math>y \in W_2</math> and <math>W_2</math> has additive inverses, then <math>(-y) \in W_2</math>.


::Then <math>(x+y)+(-y)=x \in W_2</math>.
::Then <math>(x+y)+(-y)=x \in W_2</math>.

Revision as of 14:11, 13 October 2014

Boris

Subtle Errors in Proofs

Check out these proofs:

Proof 1

Let , be subspaces of a vector space . We show that is a subspace

.

Assume that is a subspace.
Let , .
Then .
Then .
Then .
Case 1: :
Since and has additive inverses, then .
Then .
Case 2: :
Since and has additive inverses, then .
Then .
Then .
Then . Q.E.D.
Proof 2

Let . Then , define

and . We show that is not a vector

space over .

We show that is not commutative.
Let .
Then .
Then is not commutative.
Then is not a vector space. Q.E.D.


Can you spot the subtle error in each?


Error in Proof 1

The error in the proof is the logical equivalence of these two statements.

(1) Let . ... Then .

(2) Then .


Error in Proof 2

Nikita