10-327/Homework Assignment 2: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{10-327/Navigation}}
{{10-327/Navigation}}

{{In Preparation}}
===Reading===
Read sections 17 through 21 in Munkres' textbook (Topology, 2nd edition). Remember that reading math isn't like reading a novel! If you read a novel and miss a few details most likely you'll still understand the novel. But if you miss a few details in a math text, often you'll miss everything that follows. So reading math takes reading and rereading and rerereading and a lot of thought about what you've read. Also, '''preread''' sections 22 through 24, just to get a feel for the future.

===Doing===
Solve the following problems from Munkres' book, though submit only the <u>underlined</u> ones: Problems 6, <u>7</u>, 8, <u>13</u>, 14, 19abc, <u>19d</u>, 21 on pages 101-102, and problems <u>7a</u>, 7b, <u>8</u>, 9ab, <u>9c</u>, <u>13</u> on pages 111-112.

===Due date===
This assignment is due at the end of class on Thursday, October 7, 2010.


===Suggestions for Good Deeds===
===Suggestions for Good Deeds===
Annotate our Monday videos (starting with {{10-327/vp|0927}}) in a manner similar to (say) {{dbnvp link|AKT-090910-1|AKT-090910-1}}, and/or add links to the blackboard shots, in a manner similar to {{dbnvp link|Alekseev-1006-1|Alekseev-1006-1}}.
Annotate our Monday videos (starting with {{10-327/vp|0927}}) in a manner similar to (say) {{dbnvp link|AKT-090910-1|AKT-090910-1}}, and/or add links to the blackboard shots, in a manner similar to {{dbnvp link|Alekseev-1006-1|Alekseev-1006-1}}. Also, make ''constructive'' suggestions to me, {{Dror}} and / or the videographer, Qian (Sindy) Li, on how to improve the videos and / or the software used to display them. Note that "constructive" means also, "something that can be implemented relatively easily in the real world, given limited resources".

{{Template:10-327:Dror/Students Divider}}

===Remark on the Due Date===
*Dear Professor Bar-Natan, October 5 seems like a Tuesday. Do you mean October 7, 2010? Thanks! [[User:Fzhao|Fzhao]] 23:42, 30 September 2010 (EDT)Frank
**I stand corrected. [[User:Drorbn|Drorbn]] 06:33, 1 October 2010 (EDT)

===Questions===
*Hi, I have a quick question. In the last question on the assignment that is being marked, what does it mean for one function to "uniquely determine" another. Sorry, I have just never heard that terminology before. - Jdw
** It means that any two functions with the property stated in the question are actually the same. [[User:Drorbn|Drorbn]] 07:19, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
*[[User:Xwbdsb|Xwbdsb]] 00:39, 2 October 2010 (EDT) I have a question about problem 13 on page 101. What does <math>x\times x</math> mean when <math>x</math> is an element in <math>X</math>? Does the author mean the ordered pair <math>(x,x)</math>? And we assume that we put product topology on <math>X \times X</math>? -Kai
** Yes and yes. [[User:Drorbn|Drorbn]] 07:19, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
*** I found a way to approach this problem but I am not sure about the technicality. <math>X \times X</math> is Hausdorff. We take any point in <math>\Delta</math> complement. So we can separate it from any point in <math>\Delta</math>. But to separate it from the entire <math>\Delta</math> we need to get the intersection of all its open nbds. Will that still be a valid open nbd? -Kai [[User:Xwbdsb|Xwbdsb]] 11:29, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
**** An arbitrary intersection of open sets is not necessarily open. This I'll say, but beyond this, it is your problem to solve. [[User:Drorbn|Drorbn]] 16:21, 2 October 2010 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 21:43, 11 November 2010

Reading

Read sections 17 through 21 in Munkres' textbook (Topology, 2nd edition). Remember that reading math isn't like reading a novel! If you read a novel and miss a few details most likely you'll still understand the novel. But if you miss a few details in a math text, often you'll miss everything that follows. So reading math takes reading and rereading and rerereading and a lot of thought about what you've read. Also, preread sections 22 through 24, just to get a feel for the future.

Doing

Solve the following problems from Munkres' book, though submit only the underlined ones: Problems 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 19abc, 19d, 21 on pages 101-102, and problems 7a, 7b, 8, 9ab, 9c, 13 on pages 111-112.

Due date

This assignment is due at the end of class on Thursday, October 7, 2010.

Suggestions for Good Deeds

Annotate our Monday videos (starting with Video: dbnvp Topology-100927) in a manner similar to (say) dbnvp AKT-090910-1, and/or add links to the blackboard shots, in a manner similar to dbnvp Alekseev-1006-1. Also, make constructive suggestions to me, Dror and / or the videographer, Qian (Sindy) Li, on how to improve the videos and / or the software used to display them. Note that "constructive" means also, "something that can be implemented relatively easily in the real world, given limited resources".

Dror's notes above / Student's notes below

Remark on the Due Date

  • Dear Professor Bar-Natan, October 5 seems like a Tuesday. Do you mean October 7, 2010? Thanks! Fzhao 23:42, 30 September 2010 (EDT)Frank
    • I stand corrected. Drorbn 06:33, 1 October 2010 (EDT)

Questions

  • Hi, I have a quick question. In the last question on the assignment that is being marked, what does it mean for one function to "uniquely determine" another. Sorry, I have just never heard that terminology before. - Jdw
    • It means that any two functions with the property stated in the question are actually the same. Drorbn 07:19, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
  • Xwbdsb 00:39, 2 October 2010 (EDT) I have a question about problem 13 on page 101. What does Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle x\times x} mean when is an element in ? Does the author mean the ordered pair ? And we assume that we put product topology on ? -Kai
    • Yes and yes. Drorbn 07:19, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
      • I found a way to approach this problem but I am not sure about the technicality. is Hausdorff. We take any point in complement. So we can separate it from any point in . But to separate it from the entire we need to get the intersection of all its open nbds. Will that still be a valid open nbd? -Kai Xwbdsb 11:29, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
        • An arbitrary intersection of open sets is not necessarily open. This I'll say, but beyond this, it is your problem to solve. Drorbn 16:21, 2 October 2010 (EDT)