|
|
(18 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 6: |
Line 6: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) '''Bad Notation''' |
|
'''(1) Bad Notation''' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consider these three matrices: |
|
Let |
|
|
::::::::<math> |
|
::::::::<math> |
|
M_1 = |
|
M_1 = |
Line 29: |
Line 29: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
be matrices. We want to equate <math>span(M_1, M_2, M_3)</math> to the set of all symmetric <math>2 \times 2</math> matrices. Here is the wrong way to write this:
|
|
We want to equate <math>span(M_1, M_2, M_3)</math> to the set of all symmetric <math>2 \times 2</math> matrices. Here is the wrong way to write this: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 41: |
Line 41: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firstly, <math>span(M_1, M_2, M_2)</math> is the set of all linear combinations of <math>M_1, M_2, M_3</math>. To equate it to a single |
|
Firstly, <math>span(M_1, M_2, M_2)</math> is the set of all linear combinations of <math>M_1, M_2, M_3</math>. To equate it to a single symmetric <math>2 \times 2</math> matrix makes no sense. Secondly, the elements <math>a, b, c, d</math> are undefined. What are they suppose to represent? Rational numbers? Real numbers? Members of the field of two elements? The following way of writing erases those issues: |
|
|
|
|
|
symmetric |
|
|
<math>2 \times 2</math> matrix makes no sense. Secondly, the elements <math>a, b, c, d</math> are undefined. What are they suppose to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
|
|
represent? Rational numbers? Real numbers? Members of the field of two elements? The following way of writing erases those issues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
|
|
|
span(M_1, M_2, M_3) = \{ |
|
span(M_1, M_2, M_3) = \{ |
|
\begin{pmatrix} |
|
\begin{pmatrix} |
Line 56: |
Line 51: |
|
\end{pmatrix} |
|
\end{pmatrix} |
|
:a, b, c \in F \} |
|
:a, b, c \in F \} |
|
⚫ |
</math> where <math>F</math> is an arbitrary field. |
|
</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
where <math>F</math> is an arbitrary field. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
'''(2) Algorithm vs. Proof (Boris's Section Only)''' |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
When solving a problem that requires a solution to a linear equation, it is not always obvious which of the following you should show: |
⚫ |
(2) '''Algorithm vs. Proof (Boris's Section Only)''' |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
When solving a problem that requires a solution to a linear equation, it is not always obvious which of the following you |
|
|
|
|
|
should show: |
|
|
|
|
|
:a) An algorithm for finding the solution |
|
:a) An algorithm for finding the solution |
|
|
|
|
:b) A proof that a solution is correct |
|
:b) A proof that a solution is correct |
|
|
|
|
If the problem asks to solve a linear equation, then just show (a). Otherwise, consider problems such as this: |
|
If the problem asks to solve a linear equation, then just show (a). Otherwise, consider problems such as this: |
|
|
|
|
Line 79: |
Line 67: |
|
Show both (a) and (b) to be on the safe side. |
|
Show both (a) and (b) to be on the safe side. |
|
|
|
|
|
====Problem 5h) in Homework 3 for all Fields==== |
|
====Problem 5h) on Page 34 in Homework 3 for all Fields==== |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 244: |
Line 232: |
|
\end{pmatrix} |
|
\end{pmatrix} |
|
\in span(S) \iff char(F)=2</math>. ''Q.E.D.'' |
|
\in span(S) \iff char(F)=2</math>. ''Q.E.D.'' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
====A Field Problem==== |
|
====A Field Problem==== |
Line 269: |
Line 255: |
|
====A Dimension Problem==== |
|
====A Dimension Problem==== |
|
|
|
|
|
Let <math>W_1, W_2</math> be subspaces of a finite dimensional vector space <math>V</math> over a field <math>F</math> where <math>W_1 \cap W_2 = {0}</math>. Then |
|
Let <math>W_1, W_2</math> be subspaces of a finite dimensional vector space <math>V</math> over a field <math>F</math> where <math>W_1 \cap W_2 = \{0\}</math>. Then |
|
|
|
|
|
:<math>dim(span(W_1 \cup W_2)) = dim(W_1) + dim(W_2)</math>.
|
|
<math>dim(span(W_1 \cup W_2)) = dim(W_1) + dim(W_2)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
''Proof:'' |
|
|
|
|
|
We show that <math>dim(span(W_1 \cup W_2)) = dim(W_1) + dim(W_2)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
:Since <math>V</math> is finite dimensional, then <math>W_1, W_2</math> are finite dimensional. |
|
|
|
|
|
:Then we can let <math>B_1 = \{u_1, u_2, u_3, ..., u_m\}</math> be a basis of <math>W_1</math> and <math>B_2 = \{v_1, v_2, v_3, ..., v_n\}</math> be a basis of <math>W_2</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
:We show that <math>B_1 \cup B_2</math> is a basis of <math>span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
::We show that <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) = span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
:::We show that <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
::::Since <math>(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset (W_1 \cup W_2)</math>, then <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
:::We show that <math>span(W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
::::Since <math>B_1 \subset (B_1 \cup B_2)</math>, then <math>span(B_1) = W_1 \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
::::Since <math>B_2 \subset (B_1 \cup B_2)</math>, then <math>span(B_2) = W_2 \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
::::Then <math>(W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math> and <math>span(W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Then <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) = span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
::We show that <math>B_1 \cup B_2</math> is linearly independent. |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Let <math>\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{m} b_iu_i + \displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{n} c_jv_j = 0</math> where <math>b_i, c_j \in F</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Then <math>\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{m} b_iu_i = \displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{n} (-c_j)v_j</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Since <math>W_1 \cap W_2 = \{ 0 \}</math>, then <math>\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{m} b_iu_i = \displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{n} (-c_j)v_j = 0</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Since <math>B_1, B_2</math> are linearly independent, then <math>b_i = (-c_j) = 0</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
:::For <math>\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{m} b_iu_i + \displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{n} c_jv_j = 0</math>, then <math>b_i = c_j = 0</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Then <math>B_1 \cup B_2</math> is linearly independent. |
|
|
|
|
|
::Then <math>B_1 \cup B_2</math> is a basis of <math>span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
:Since <math>\left| B_1 \cup B_2 \right| = \left| B_1 \right| + \left| B_2 \right|</math>, then <math>dim(span(W_1 \cup W_2)) = dim(W_1) + dim(W_2)</math>. ''Q.E.D.'' |
|
|
|
|
|
==Nikita== |
|
==Nikita== |
|
|
[[File:1014.240.pdf]] |
|
|
|
|
|
==Scanned Tutorial Notes by [[User Boyang.wu|Boyang.wu]]== |
|
|
[[File:Tut6.pdf]] |
Welcome to Math 240! (additions to this web site no longer count towards good deed points)
|
#
|
Week of...
|
Notes and Links
|
1
|
Sep 8
|
About This Class, What is this class about? (PDF, HTML), Monday, Wednesday
|
2
|
Sep 15
|
HW1, Monday, Wednesday, TheComplexField.pdf,HW1_solutions.pdf
|
3
|
Sep 22
|
HW2, Class Photo, Monday, Wednesday, HW2_solutions.pdf
|
4
|
Sep 29
|
HW3, Wednesday, Tutorial, HW3_solutions.pdf
|
5
|
Oct 6
|
HW4, Monday, Wednesday, Tutorial, HW4_solutions.pdf
|
6
|
Oct 13
|
No Monday class (Thanksgiving), Wednesday, Tutorial
|
7
|
Oct 20
|
HW5, Term Test at tutorials on Tuesday, Wednesday
|
8
|
Oct 27
|
HW6, Monday, Why LinAlg?, Wednesday, Tutorial
|
9
|
Nov 3
|
Monday is the last day to drop this class, HW7, Monday, Wednesday, Tutorial
|
10
|
Nov 10
|
HW8, Monday, Tutorial
|
11
|
Nov 17
|
Monday-Tuesday is UofT November break
|
12
|
Nov 24
|
HW9
|
13
|
Dec 1
|
Wednesday is a "makeup Monday"! End-of-Course Schedule, Tutorial
|
F
|
Dec 8
|
The Final Exam
|
Register of Good Deeds
|
Add your name / see who's in!
|
|
|
Boris
Elementary and (Not So Elementary) Errors in Homework
(1) Bad Notation
Consider these three matrices:
We want to equate to the set of all symmetric matrices. Here is the wrong way to write this:
- .
Firstly, is the set of all linear combinations of . To equate it to a single symmetric matrix makes no sense. Secondly, the elements are undefined. What are they suppose to represent? Rational numbers? Real numbers? Members of the field of two elements? The following way of writing erases those issues:
- where is an arbitrary field.
(2) Algorithm vs. Proof (Boris's Section Only)
When solving a problem that requires a solution to a linear equation, it is not always obvious which of the following you should show:
- a) An algorithm for finding the solution
- b) A proof that a solution is correct
If the problem asks to solve a linear equation, then just show (a). Otherwise, consider problems such as this:
- Determine if the vector is a linear combination of the vectors in .
Show both (a) and (b) to be on the safe side.
Problem 5h) on Page 34 in Homework 3 for all Fields
For an arbitrary field , determine if the matrix
is in span
.
Proof:
We show that
.
- We show that .
- Assume that .
- Let .
- Then .
- Then .
- Since and the entries of the matrix are from , then .
- Then .
- Then .
- We show that .
- Assume to the contrary that .
- Then .
- Then this system of linear equations has a solution:
- .
- When solving this system, we see that it has no solution.
- This contradicts the assumption that it has a solution.
- Then .
- Then . Q.E.D.
A Field Problem
Find the solution to in .
Note that a polynomial of degree has at most solutions.
Algorithm:
We find the solution to in .
- Since in , then .
- Since is additive inverse of , then .
- By the result that we proved in Question 2 of Homework 1, then .
- Then are the solutions.
A Dimension Problem
Let be subspaces of a finite dimensional vector space over a field where . Then
.
Proof:
We show that .
- Since is finite dimensional, then are finite dimensional.
- Then we can let be a basis of and be a basis of .
- We show that is a basis of .
- We show that .
- We show that .
- Since , then .
- We show that .
- Since , then .
- Since , then .
- Then and .
- Then .
- We show that is linearly independent.
- Let where .
- Then .
- Since , then .
- Since are linearly independent, then .
- For , then .
- Then is linearly independent.
- Then is a basis of .
- Since , then . Q.E.D.
Nikita
File:1014.240.pdf
Scanned Tutorial Notes by Boyang.wu
File:Tut6.pdf