10-327/Classnotes for Thursday November 4: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


See some blackboard shots at {{BBS Link|10_327-101104-142342.jpg}}.
See some blackboard shots at {{BBS Link|10_327-101104-142342.jpg}}.

{{Template:10-327:Dror/Students Divider}}

Question: Regarding the proof of the Lebesque Number Lemma, let T(x) be the function we were working with in the proof. I am confused with how we reached the conclusion that if d(x,y)<E, then T(y)>= T(x) - E. I know that it was said that this is just an application of the triangle inequality, but I am having a bit of trouble seeing that. Hopefully someone can make this point a bit clearer for me. Thanks! Jason.

Revision as of 13:37, 6 November 2010

See some blackboard shots at BBS/10_327-101104-142342.jpg.

Dror's notes above / Student's notes below

Question: Regarding the proof of the Lebesque Number Lemma, let T(x) be the function we were working with in the proof. I am confused with how we reached the conclusion that if d(x,y)<E, then T(y)>= T(x) - E. I know that it was said that this is just an application of the triangle inequality, but I am having a bit of trouble seeing that. Hopefully someone can make this point a bit clearer for me. Thanks! Jason.