11-1100/Homework Assignment 3

From Drorbn
Revision as of 15:55, 30 October 2011 by Drorbn (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
In Preparation

The information below is preliminary and cannot be trusted! (v)

This assignment is due at class time on Tuesday, November 15, 2011.

Solve the following questions

Problem 1. (Selick) Show that any group of order 56 has a normal Sylow- subgroup, for some prime dividing 56.

Problem 2. (Qualifying exam, May 1997) Let act on by permuting the factors, and let be the semi-direct product of and .

  1. What is the order of ?
  2. How many Sylow-5 subgroups does have? Write down one of them.

Problem 3. (Selick) Show that the group of unit quaternions (, subject to and ) is not a semi-direct product of two of its proper subgroups.

Problem 4. (Qualifying exam, September 2008) Let be a finite group and be a prime. Show that if is a -subgroup of , then is congruent to mod . You may wish to study the action of on by multiplication on the left.

Problem 5. (easy)

  1. Prove that in any ring, .
  2. Prove that even in a ring without a unit, .

(Feel free to do the second part first and then to substitute ).

Problem 6.

  1. (Qualifying exam, Ajavascript:insertTags('','Insert%20formula%20here');pril 2009) Prove that a finite integral domain is a field.
  2. (Qualifying exam, September 2008) Prove that in a finite commutative ring, every prime ideal is maximal.

Problem 7. (Dummit and Foote) A ring is called a Boolean ring if for all .

  1. Prove that every Boolean ring is commutative.
  2. Prove that the only Boolean ring that is also an integral domain is .

Problem 8. (bonus) Let be the ring of bounded sequences of real numbers with pointwise addition and multiplication, let be the ideal made of all sequences that are equal to except in at most finitely many places, and let be a maximal ideal in containing .

  1. Prove that .
  2. Denote by the projection of to composed with the identification of the latter with , so that . Prove that for any scalar and any bounded sequences , we have that , , and . (Easy, no bonuses for this part).
  3. Prove that if in the ordinary sense of limits of sequences, then .