14-240/Tutorial-November4: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 33: Line 33:


This approach requires a little more cleverness when constructing the basis: <math>S = \{x - a, (x^2 - a^2), (x^3 - a^3), ..., (x^n - a^n)\}</math>.
This approach requires a little more cleverness when constructing the basis: <math>S = \{x - a, (x^2 - a^2), (x^3 - a^3), ..., (x^n - a^n)\}</math>.


====Cite Carefully====

'''Boris's Section Only'''

If you use in your proof '''Corollary 1 of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra''', then please cite as "Corollary 1 of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra". Do not cite it as the "Fundamental Theorem of Algebra" since the fundamental theorem and its corollaries are not the same.



==Nikita==
==Nikita==

Revision as of 17:47, 30 November 2014

Boris

Question 26 on Page 57 in Homework 5

Let and be a subspace of . Find .


First, let . Then we can decompose since there is a such that . From here, there are several approaches:


Approach 1: Use Isomorphisms


We show that is isomorphic to . Let be the standard ordered basis of and be a subset of . Then there is a unique linear transformation such that where . Show that is both one-to-one and onto and conclude that .


Approach 2: Use the Rank-Nullity Theorem


Let be the standard ordered basis of and . Then where and . Define by . Then it is easy to show that is both well-defined and linear. Afterwards, show that and use the rank-nullity theorem to conclude that .


Approach 3: Find a Basis with the Decomposed Polynomial


This approach is straightforward. Show that is a basis of .


Approach 4: Find a Basis without the Decomposed Polynomial


This approach requires a little more cleverness when constructing the basis: .


Cite Carefully

Boris's Section Only

If you use in your proof Corollary 1 of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, then please cite as "Corollary 1 of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra". Do not cite it as the "Fundamental Theorem of Algebra" since the fundamental theorem and its corollaries are not the same.


Nikita