14-240/Tutorial-October14: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:




(1) '''Bad Notation'''
'''(1) Bad Notation'''




Consider these three matrices:
Let
::::::::<math>
::::::::<math>
M_1 =
M_1 =
Line 29: Line 29:




be matrices. We want to equate <math>span(M_1, M_2, M_3)</math> to the set of all symmetric <math>2 \times 2</math> matrices. Here is the wrong way to write this:
We want to equate <math>span(M_1, M_2, M_3)</math> to the set of all symmetric <math>2 \times 2</math> matrices. Here is the wrong way to write this:




Line 41: Line 41:




Firstly, <math>span(M_1, M_2, M_2)</math> is the set of all linear combinations of <math>M_1, M_2, M_3</math>. To equate it to a single
Firstly, <math>span(M_1, M_2, M_2)</math> is the set of all linear combinations of <math>M_1, M_2, M_3</math>. To equate it to a single symmetric <math>2 \times 2</math> matrix makes no sense. Secondly, the elements <math>a, b, c, d</math> are undefined. What are they suppose to represent? Rational numbers? Real numbers? Members of the field of two elements? The following way of writing erases those issues:


symmetric
<math>2 \times 2</math> matrix makes no sense. Secondly, the elements <math>a, b, c, d</math> are undefined. What are they suppose to


:::::<math>
represent? Rational numbers? Real numbers? Members of the field of two elements? The following way of writing erases those issues:


::::::::<math>
span(M_1, M_2, M_3) = \{
span(M_1, M_2, M_3) = \{
\begin{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
Line 56: Line 51:
\end{pmatrix}
\end{pmatrix}
:a, b, c \in F \}
:a, b, c \in F \}
</math> where <math>F</math> is an arbitrary field.
</math>


where <math>F</math> is an arbitrary field.


'''(2) Algorithm vs. Proof (Boris's Section Only)'''


When solving a problem that requires a solution to a linear equation, it is not always obvious which of the following you should show:
(2) '''Algorithm vs. Proof (Boris's Section Only)'''

When solving a problem that requires a solution to a linear equation, it is not always obvious which of the following you

should show:
:a) An algorithm for finding the solution
:a) An algorithm for finding the solution

:b) A proof that a solution is correct
:b) A proof that a solution is correct

If the problem asks to solve a linear equation, then just show (a). Otherwise, consider problems such as this:
If the problem asks to solve a linear equation, then just show (a). Otherwise, consider problems such as this:


Line 79: Line 67:
Show both (a) and (b) to be on the safe side.
Show both (a) and (b) to be on the safe side.


====Problem 5h) in Homework 3 for all Fields====
====Problem 5h) on Page 34 in Homework 3 for all Fields====




Line 244: Line 232:
\end{pmatrix}
\end{pmatrix}
\in span(S) \iff char(F)=2</math>. ''Q.E.D.''
\in span(S) \iff char(F)=2</math>. ''Q.E.D.''




====A Field Problem====
====A Field Problem====
Line 274: Line 260:




''Proof''
''Proof:''

We show that <math>dim(span(W_1 \cup W_2)) = dim(W_1) + dim(W_2)</math>.

:Since <math>V</math> is finite dimensional, then <math>W_1, W_2</math> are finite dimensional.

:Then we can let <math>B_1 = \{u_1, u_2, u_3, ..., u_m\}</math> be a basis of <math>W_1</math> and <math>B_2 = \{v_1, v_2, v_3, ..., v_n\}</math> be a basis of <math>W_2</math>.

:We show that <math>B_1 \cup B_2</math> is a basis of <math>span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>.

::We show that <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) = span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>.

:::We show that <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>.

::::Since <math>(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset (W_1 \cup W_2)</math>, then <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>.

:::We show that <math>span(W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>.

::::Since <math>B_1 \subset (B_1 \cup B_2)</math>, then <math>span(B_1) = W_1 \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>.

::::Since <math>B_2 \subset (B_1 \cup B_2)</math>, then <math>span(B_2) = W_2 \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>.

::::Then <math>(W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math> and <math>span(W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2)</math>.

:::Then <math>span(B_1 \cup B_2) = span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>.

::We show that <math>B_1 \cup B_2</math> is linearly independent.

:::Let <math>\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{m} b_iu_i + \displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{n} c_jv_j = 0</math> where <math>b_i, c_j \in F</math>.

:::Then <math>\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{m} b_iu_i = \displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{n} (-c_j)v_j</math>.

:::Since <math>W_1 \cap W_2 = \{ 0 \}</math>, then <math>\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{m} b_iu_i = \displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{n} (-c_j)v_j = 0</math>.

:::Since <math>B_1, B_2</math> are linearly independent, then <math>b_i = (-c_j) = 0</math>.

:::For <math>\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{m} b_iu_i + \displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{n} c_jv_j = 0</math>, then <math>b_i = c_j = 0</math>.

:::Then <math>B_1 \cup B_2</math> is linearly independent.

::Then <math>B_1 \cup B_2</math> is a basis of <math>span(W_1 \cup W_2)</math>.

:Since <math>\left| B_1 \cup B_2 \right| = \left| B_1 \right| + \left| B_2 \right|</math>, then <math>dim(span(W_1 \cup W_2)) = dim(W_1) + dim(W_2)</math>. ''Q.E.D.''


==Nikita==
==Nikita==
[[File:1014.240.pdf]]

==Scanned Tutorial Notes by [[User Boyang.wu|Boyang.wu]]==
[[File:Tut6.pdf]]

Latest revision as of 14:08, 8 December 2014

Boris

Elementary and (Not So Elementary) Errors in Homework

(1) Bad Notation


Consider these three matrices:

[math]\displaystyle{ M_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, M_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix}, M_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix} }[/math]


We want to equate [math]\displaystyle{ span(M_1, M_2, M_3) }[/math] to the set of all symmetric [math]\displaystyle{ 2 \times 2 }[/math] matrices. Here is the wrong way to write this:


[math]\displaystyle{ span(M_1, M_2, M_3) = \begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ b & c \\ \end{pmatrix} }[/math].


Firstly, [math]\displaystyle{ span(M_1, M_2, M_2) }[/math] is the set of all linear combinations of [math]\displaystyle{ M_1, M_2, M_3 }[/math]. To equate it to a single symmetric [math]\displaystyle{ 2 \times 2 }[/math] matrix makes no sense. Secondly, the elements [math]\displaystyle{ a, b, c, d }[/math] are undefined. What are they suppose to represent? Rational numbers? Real numbers? Members of the field of two elements? The following way of writing erases those issues:


[math]\displaystyle{ span(M_1, M_2, M_3) = \{ \begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ b & c \\ \end{pmatrix} :a, b, c \in F \} }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ F }[/math] is an arbitrary field.


(2) Algorithm vs. Proof (Boris's Section Only)

When solving a problem that requires a solution to a linear equation, it is not always obvious which of the following you should show:

a) An algorithm for finding the solution
b) A proof that a solution is correct

If the problem asks to solve a linear equation, then just show (a). Otherwise, consider problems such as this:


Determine if the vector [math]\displaystyle{ (-2, 2, 2) }[/math] is a linear combination of the vectors [math]\displaystyle{ (- (1, 2, -1), (-3, -3, 3) }[/math] in [math]\displaystyle{ R^3 }[/math].


Show both (a) and (b) to be on the safe side.

Problem 5h) on Page 34 in Homework 3 for all Fields

For an arbitrary field [math]\displaystyle{ F }[/math], determine if the matrix [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} }[/math] is in span [math]\displaystyle{ S=\{ \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ -1 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix} \} }[/math].


Proof:

We show that [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} \in span(S) \iff char(F)=2 }[/math].

We show that [math]\displaystyle{ char(F)=2 \implies \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} \in span(S) }[/math].
Assume that [math]\displaystyle{ char(F)=2 }[/math].
Let [math]\displaystyle{ c_1=0, c_2=1, c_3=1 }[/math].
Then [math]\displaystyle{ c_1, c_2, c_3 \in F }[/math].
Then [math]\displaystyle{ c_1 \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ -1 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix} + c_2 \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} + c_3 \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} }[/math].
Since [math]\displaystyle{ char(F)=2 }[/math] and the entries of the matrix are from [math]\displaystyle{ F }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ 0=2 }[/math].
Then [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} \in span(S) }[/math].
Then [math]\displaystyle{ char(F)=2 \implies \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} \in span(S) }[/math].
We show that [math]\displaystyle{ char(F) \neq 2 \implies \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} \notin span(S) }[/math].
Assume to the contrary that [math]\displaystyle{ char(F) \neq 2 \and \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} \in span(S) }[/math].
Then [math]\displaystyle{ \exists c_1, c_2, c_3 \in F, \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} =c_1 \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ -1 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix} +c_2 \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} +c_3 \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix} }[/math].
Then this system of linear equations has a solution:
[math]\displaystyle{ (11)c_1+c_3=1 }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ (21)-c_1=0 }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ (12)c_2+c_3=0 }[/math]
[math]\displaystyle{ (22)c_2=1 }[/math].
When solving this system, we see that it has no solution.
This contradicts the assumption that it has a solution.
Then [math]\displaystyle{ char(F) \neq2 \implies \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} \notin span(S) }[/math].
Then [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} \in span(S) \iff char(F)=2 }[/math]. Q.E.D.

A Field Problem

Find the solution to [math]\displaystyle{ x^2 = -2 }[/math] in [math]\displaystyle{ Z_{11} }[/math].

Note that a polynomial of [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] degree has at most [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math] solutions.


Algorithm:

We find the solution to [math]\displaystyle{ x^2 = -2 }[/math] in [math]\displaystyle{ Z_{11} }[/math].

Since in [math]\displaystyle{ Z_{11}, -2 = 9 }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ x^2 = 9 }[/math].
Since [math]\displaystyle{ -9 }[/math] is additive inverse of [math]\displaystyle{ 9 }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ x^2 - 9 = 9 - 9 = 0 }[/math].
By the result that we proved in Question 2 of Homework 1, then [math]\displaystyle{ (x^2 - 9) = (x - 3)(x + 3) = 0 }[/math].
Then [math]\displaystyle{ x = \pm 3 }[/math] are the solutions.


A Dimension Problem

Let [math]\displaystyle{ W_1, W_2 }[/math] be subspaces of a finite dimensional vector space [math]\displaystyle{ V }[/math] over a field [math]\displaystyle{ F }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ W_1 \cap W_2 = \{0\} }[/math]. Then

[math]\displaystyle{ dim(span(W_1 \cup W_2)) = dim(W_1) + dim(W_2) }[/math].


Proof:

We show that [math]\displaystyle{ dim(span(W_1 \cup W_2)) = dim(W_1) + dim(W_2) }[/math].

Since [math]\displaystyle{ V }[/math] is finite dimensional, then [math]\displaystyle{ W_1, W_2 }[/math] are finite dimensional.
Then we can let [math]\displaystyle{ B_1 = \{u_1, u_2, u_3, ..., u_m\} }[/math] be a basis of [math]\displaystyle{ W_1 }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ B_2 = \{v_1, v_2, v_3, ..., v_n\} }[/math] be a basis of [math]\displaystyle{ W_2 }[/math].
We show that [math]\displaystyle{ B_1 \cup B_2 }[/math] is a basis of [math]\displaystyle{ span(W_1 \cup W_2) }[/math].
We show that [math]\displaystyle{ span(B_1 \cup B_2) = span(W_1 \cup W_2) }[/math].
We show that [math]\displaystyle{ span(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset span(W_1 \cup W_2) }[/math].
Since [math]\displaystyle{ (B_1 \cup B_2) \subset (W_1 \cup W_2) }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ span(B_1 \cup B_2) \subset span(W_1 \cup W_2) }[/math].
We show that [math]\displaystyle{ span(W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2) }[/math].
Since [math]\displaystyle{ B_1 \subset (B_1 \cup B_2) }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ span(B_1) = W_1 \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2) }[/math].
Since [math]\displaystyle{ B_2 \subset (B_1 \cup B_2) }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ span(B_2) = W_2 \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2) }[/math].
Then [math]\displaystyle{ (W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2) }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ span(W_1 \cup W_2) \subset span(B_1 \cup B_2) }[/math].
Then [math]\displaystyle{ span(B_1 \cup B_2) = span(W_1 \cup W_2) }[/math].
We show that [math]\displaystyle{ B_1 \cup B_2 }[/math] is linearly independent.
Let [math]\displaystyle{ \displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{m} b_iu_i + \displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{n} c_jv_j = 0 }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ b_i, c_j \in F }[/math].
Then [math]\displaystyle{ \displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{m} b_iu_i = \displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{n} (-c_j)v_j }[/math].
Since [math]\displaystyle{ W_1 \cap W_2 = \{ 0 \} }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ \displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{m} b_iu_i = \displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{n} (-c_j)v_j = 0 }[/math].
Since [math]\displaystyle{ B_1, B_2 }[/math] are linearly independent, then [math]\displaystyle{ b_i = (-c_j) = 0 }[/math].
For [math]\displaystyle{ \displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{m} b_iu_i + \displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^{n} c_jv_j = 0 }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ b_i = c_j = 0 }[/math].
Then [math]\displaystyle{ B_1 \cup B_2 }[/math] is linearly independent.
Then [math]\displaystyle{ B_1 \cup B_2 }[/math] is a basis of [math]\displaystyle{ span(W_1 \cup W_2) }[/math].
Since [math]\displaystyle{ \left| B_1 \cup B_2 \right| = \left| B_1 \right| + \left| B_2 \right| }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ dim(span(W_1 \cup W_2)) = dim(W_1) + dim(W_2) }[/math]. Q.E.D.

Nikita

File:1014.240.pdf

Scanned Tutorial Notes by Boyang.wu

File:Tut6.pdf