14-240/Tutorial-Sep30: Difference between revisions
(17 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Find a set <math>S</math> of two elements that satisfies the following: |
Find a set <math>S</math> of two elements that satisfies the following: |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
Solution: |
Solution: |
||
Let <math>a \ |
Let <math>S = \{ a, b \} </math> where <math>a</math> is the additive identity and <math>b</math> is the multiplicative identity and <math>a \neq b</math>. After trial and error, we have the following addition and multiplication tables: |
||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
Line 43: | Line 44: | ||
| <math>b</math> |
| <math>b</math> |
||
|} |
|} |
||
We verify that <math>S</math> satisfies (1). By the addition and multiplication tables, then <math>S</math> satisfies closure, commutativity, associativity and existence of identities and inverses. Since <math>a(b + b) = a(a) = b \neq a = a + a = ab + ab</math>, then <math>S</math> does not satisfy distributivity. Then <math>S</math> satisfies (1). |
|||
We verify that <math>S</math> satisfies (2). Since <math>aa = b \neq a</math>, then <math>S</math> satisfies (2). |
|||
====Elementary Errors in Homework==== |
|||
(1) Prove <math>A \implies B</math>. Assume <math>A</math> and derive <math>B</math>. It is not the other way around. |
|||
(2) Prove <math>A \iff B</math>. Show that <math>A \implies B</math> and <math>B \implies A</math>. |
|||
(3) '''This is for Boris's section only'''. When a proof requires a previous result, there are two possibilities: |
|||
:(a) The result is already proved in class or in a previous homework. Then state the result and use it without proof. |
|||
:(b) The result is neither proved in class nor in a previous homework. Then reference it in the textbook or prove it yourself. |
|||
==Nikita== |
==Nikita== |
Latest revision as of 23:13, 4 October 2014
|
Boris
Problem
Find a set of two elements that satisfies the following:
(1) satisfies all the properties of the field except distributivity.
(2) .
Solution:
Let where is the additive identity and is the multiplicative identity and . After trial and error, we have the following addition and multiplication tables:
We verify that satisfies (1). By the addition and multiplication tables, then satisfies closure, commutativity, associativity and existence of identities and inverses. Since , then does not satisfy distributivity. Then satisfies (1).
We verify that satisfies (2). Since , then satisfies (2).
Elementary Errors in Homework
(1) Prove . Assume and derive . It is not the other way around.
(2) Prove . Show that and .
(3) This is for Boris's section only. When a proof requires a previous result, there are two possibilities:
- (a) The result is already proved in class or in a previous homework. Then state the result and use it without proof.
- (b) The result is neither proved in class nor in a previous homework. Then reference it in the textbook or prove it yourself.