14-240/Classnotes for Wednesday September 10: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "Knowledge about Fields : During this lecture, at the beginning, we talked about the properties of the real numbers. Then we applied these properties to the "Field". At the en...")
 
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{14-240/Navigation}}
Knowledge about Fields :
Knowledge about Fields:


During this lecture, at the beginning, we talked about the properties of the real numbers. Then we applied these properties to the "Field". At the end of the lecture, we learned how to prove basic properties of field.
During this lecture, we first talked about the properties of the real numbers. Then we applied these properties to the "Field". At the end of the lecture, we learned how to prove basic properties of fields.


The real numbers: A set R with
+ : R + R -> R;
* : R * R -> R;


===The Real Numbers===
s.t.
R1 : for every a , b belong to R , a + b = b + a & a * b = b * a;
R2 : for every a , b , c belong to R , (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) & (a * b) * c = a * (b * c);
R3 : "existence of units" : for every a belongs to R , a + 0 = a ("additive unit") & a * 1 = a ("multiplicative unit");
R4 : "the existence of inverses" : for every a belongs to R , there exists b belongs to R , s.t. a + b = 0;
for every a belongs to R , a is not equal to 0 , there exists b , s.t a * b = 1;
R5 : "the distributive law" : for every a , b , c belong to R , (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c;


====Properties of Real Numbers====
True for R , yet does not follow from R1 to R5.

For every a belongs to R , there exists x belongs to R , s.t. a = x square or -a = x square;
The real numbers are a set <math>\R</math> with two binary operations:
PS: This "or" here means "inclusive or" !!!

in Q which means rational numbers , let us take a = 2 , there not exists x belongs to Q , s.t. 2 = x square;
<math>+ : \R \times \R \rightarrow \R</math>

<math>* : \R \times \R \rightarrow \R</math>

such that the following properties hold.

* R1 : <math>\forall a, b \in \R, a + b = b + a ~\&~ a * b = b * a</math> (the commutative law)

* R2 : <math>\forall a, b, c \in \R, (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) ~\&~ (a * b) * c = a * (b * c)</math> (the associative law)

* R3 : <math>\forall a \in \R, a + 0 = a ~\&~ a * 1 = a</math> (existence of units: 0 is known as the
| "additive unit" and 1 as the "multiplicative unit")

* R4 : <math>\forall a \in \R, \exists b \in \R, a + b = 0</math>;
| <math>\forall a \in \R, a \ne 0 \Rightarrow \exists b \in \R, a * b = 1</math> (existence of inverses)

* R5 : <math>\forall a, b, c \in \R, (a + b) * c = (a * c) + (b * c)</math> (the distributive law)

====Properties That Do Not Follow from R1-R5====

There are properties which are true for <math>\R</math>, but do not follow from R1 to R5. For example ('''note''' that OR in mathematics denotes an "inclusive or"):
<math>\forall a \in \R, \exists x \in \R, a = x^2</math> OR <math>-a = x^2</math> (the existence of square roots)

Consider another set that satisfies all the properties R1 to R5. In <math>\Q</math> (the rational numbers), let us take </math>a = 2</math>. There is no <math>x \in \Q</math> such that <math>x^2 = a = 2</math>, so the statement above is not true for the rational numbers!


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


===Fields===
Field :
====Definition====


Definition: A "field" is a set F along with a pair of binary operations :
A "field" is a set <math>\mathbb{F}</math> along with a pair of binary operations:
+ : F + F -> F;
<math>+ : \mathbb{F} \times \mathbb{F} \rightarrow \mathbb{F}</math>

* : F * F -> F;
<math>* : \mathbb{F} \times \mathbb{F} \rightarrow \mathbb{F}</math>
and along with a pair 0 , 1 belong to F , 0 is not equal to 1 & s.t. F1 to F5 hold.

and along with a pair <math>(0, 1) \in \mathbb{F}, 0 \ne 1</math>, such that the following properties hold.

* F1 : <math>\forall a, b \in \mathbb{F}, a + b = b + a ~\&~ a * b = b * a</math> (the commutative law)

* F2 : <math>\forall a, b, c \in \mathbb{F}, (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) ~\&~ (a * b) * c = a * (b * c)</math> (the associative law)

* F3 : <math>\forall a \in \mathbb{F}, a + 0 = a ~\&~ a * 1 = a</math> (existence of units)

* F4 : <math>\forall a \in \mathbb{F}, \exists b \in \mathbb{F}, a + b = 0</math>;
| <math>\forall a \in \mathbb{F}, a \ne 0 \Rightarrow \exists b \in \mathbb{F}, a * b = 1</math> (existence of inverses)

* F5 : <math>\forall a, b, c \in \mathbb{F}, (a + b) * c = (a * c) + (b * c)</math> (the distributive law)
====Examples====

# <math>\R</math> is a field.
# <math>\Q</math> (the rational numbers) is a field.
# <math>\C</math> (the complex numbers) is a field.
# <math>\mathbb{F} = \{0, 1\}</math> with operations defined as follows (known as <math>\mathbb{F}_2</math> or <math>\Z/2</math>) is a field:

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! +
! 0
! 1
|-
! 0
| 0
| 1
|-
! 1
| 1
| 0
|}

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! *
! 0
! 1
|-
! 0
| 0
| 0
|-
! 1
| 0
| 1
|}

<br style="clear:both;">

More generally, for every prime number <math>P</math>, <math>\mathbb{F}_p = \{0, 1, 2, 3, \cdots, p - 1\}</math> is a field, with operations defined by
<math>(a, b) \rightarrow a + b \mod P</math>.

An example: <math>\mathbb{F}_7 = \{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6\}</math>, the operations are like remainders when divided by 7, or "like remainders mod 7". For example, <math>4 + 6 = 4 + 6 \mod 7</math> and <math>3 * 5 = 3 * 5 \mod 7</math>.

====Basic Properties of Fields====

'''Theorem''':
Let <math>\mathbb{F}</math> be a field, and let <math>a, b, c</math> denote elements of <math>\mathbb{F}</math>. Then:
# <math>a + b = c + b \Rightarrow a = c</math> (cancellation law)
# <math>b \ne 0 ~\&~ a * b = c * b \Rightarrow a = c</math>
Proof of 1:
1. By F4, <math>\exists b' \in \mathbb{F}, b + b' = 0</math>.
We know that <math>a + b = c + b</math>;
Therefore <math>(a + b) + b' = (c + b) + b'</math>.
2. By F2, <math>a + (b + b') = c + (b + b')</math>,
so by the choice of <math>b'</math>, we know that <math>a + 0 = c + 0</math>.
3. Therefore, by F3, <math>a = c</math>.
^_^
Proof of 2: more or less the same.

3. If <math>0' \in \mathbb{F}</math> is "like 0", then it is 0:
If <math>0' \in \mathbb{F}</math> satisfies <math>\forall a \in \mathbb{F}, a + 0' = a</math>, then 0' = 0.

4. If <math>1' \in \mathbb{F}</math> is "like 1", then it is 1:
If <math>1' \in \mathbb{F}</math> satisfies that <math>\forall a \in \mathbb{F}, a * 1' = a</math>, then 1' = 1.

Proof of 3 :
1. By F3 , 0' = 0' + 0.
2. By F1 , 0' + 0 = 0 + 0'.
3. By assumption on 0', 0' = 0 + 0' = 0.
^_^

5. <math>\forall a, b, b' \in \mathbb{F}, a + b = 0 ~\&~ a + b' = 0 \Rightarrow b = b'</math>:
In any field "<math>-a</math>" makes sense because it is unique -- it has an unambiguous meaning.
<math>(-a):</math> the <math>b</math> such that <math>a + b = 0</math>.

6. <math>\forall a, b, b' \in \mathbb{F}, a \ne 0 ~\&~ a * b = 1 = a * b' \Rightarrow b = b'</math>:
In any field, if <math>a \ne 0</math>, "<math>a^{-1}</math>" makes sense.

Proof of 5 :
1. <math>a + b = 0 = a + b'</math>.
2. By F1, <math>b + a = b'+ a</math>.
3. By cancellation, <math>b = b'</math>.
^_^

7. <math>-(-a) = a</math> and when <math>a \ne 0</math>, <math>(a^{-1})^{-1} = a</math>.
Proof of 7 :
Examples: 1. R is a field;
2. Q which means rational numbers is a field;
1. By definition, <math>a + (-a) = 0</math>. (*)
3. C which means complex numbers is a field;
2. By definition, <math>(-a) + (-(-a) = 0</math>.
4. F = {0 , 1} is a field:
3. By (*) and F1, <math>(-a) + a = 0</math>.
+ 0 1 * 0 1
4. By property 5, <math>-(-a) = a</math>.
^_^
0 0 1 0 0 0

1 1 0 1 0 1
===Scanned Lecture Notes by [[User:AM|AM]]===
F = {0 , 1} = F2 = Z/2

5. For every prime number P : Fp = {0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , ... , p-1} is a field;
<gallery>
along with + & * defined as above;
File:MAT 240 (1 of 2) Sept 10, 2014.pdf‎|page 1
(a , b) -> a + b mod p
File:MAT 240 (2 of 2) Sept 10, 2014.pdf‎|page 2
foe example : F7 = {1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6};
</gallery>
+ like remainder when you divided by 7;
==Scanned Lecture Notes by [[User Boyang.wu|Boyang.wu]]==
like remainders mod 7.


[[File:w121.pdf]]
Thm (basic properties of fields) :
[[File:W122.pdf]]
Let F be a field, and let a , b , c denote elements of F' , then
1. a + b = c + b => a = c "concellation law"
2. b is not equal to 0 & a * b = c * b => a = c;

Latest revision as of 00:56, 8 December 2014

Knowledge about Fields:

During this lecture, we first talked about the properties of the real numbers. Then we applied these properties to the "Field". At the end of the lecture, we learned how to prove basic properties of fields.


The Real Numbers

Properties of Real Numbers

The real numbers are a set with two binary operations:

     
     

such that the following properties hold.

  • R1 : (the commutative law)
  • R2 : (the associative law)
  • R3 : (existence of units: 0 is known as the

| "additive unit" and 1 as the "multiplicative unit")

  • R4 : ;

| (existence of inverses)

  • R5 : (the distributive law)

Properties That Do Not Follow from R1-R5

There are properties which are true for , but do not follow from R1 to R5. For example (note that OR in mathematics denotes an "inclusive or"):

      OR  (the existence of square roots)

Consider another set that satisfies all the properties R1 to R5. In (the rational numbers), let us take </math>a = 2</math>. There is no such that , so the statement above is not true for the rational numbers!


Fields

Definition

A "field" is a set along with a pair of binary operations:

     
     

and along with a pair , such that the following properties hold.

  • F1 : (the commutative law)
  • F2 : (the associative law)
  • F3 : (existence of units)
  • F4 : ;

| (existence of inverses)

  • F5 : (the distributive law)

Examples

  1. is a field.
  2. (the rational numbers) is a field.
  3. (the complex numbers) is a field.
  4. with operations defined as follows (known as or ) is a field:
+ 0 1
0 0 1
1 1 0
* 0 1
0 0 0
1 0 1


More generally, for every prime number , is a field, with operations defined by .

An example: , the operations are like remainders when divided by 7, or "like remainders mod 7". For example, and .

Basic Properties of Fields

Theorem: Let be a field, and let denote elements of . Then:

  1. (cancellation law)
     Proof of 1: 
     1. By F4, .
        We know that ;                                        
        Therefore .
     2. By F2, ,
        so by the choice of , we know that .
     3. Therefore, by F3, .          
     ^_^     
      
     Proof of 2: more or less the same.

3. If is "like 0", then it is 0:

  If  satisfies , then 0' = 0.

4. If is "like 1", then it is 1:

  If  satisfies that , then 1' = 1.
     Proof of 3 : 
     1. By F3 , 0' = 0' + 0.
     2. By F1 , 0' + 0 = 0 + 0'.
     3. By assumption on 0', 0' = 0 + 0' = 0.   
     ^_^

5. :

  In any field "" makes sense because it is unique -- it has an unambiguous meaning.
   the  such that .

6. :

  In any field, if , "" makes sense.  
     Proof of 5 :    
     1. .
     2. By F1, .
     3. By cancellation, .              
     ^_^ 

7. and when , .

     Proof of 7 : 
     1. By definition, .          (*)
     2. By definition, .
     3. By (*) and F1, .
     4. By property 5, .    
     ^_^

Scanned Lecture Notes by AM

Scanned Lecture Notes by Boyang.wu

File:W121.pdf File:W122.pdf