|
|
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{12-267/Navigation}} |
|
|
|
|
Disclamer: This is a student prepared note based on the lecures of [http://drorbn.net/dbnvp/12-267-120928.php Friday, September 28th] and [http://drorbn.net/dbnvp/12-267-121001.php Monday October 1st]. |
|
Disclamer: This is a student prepared note based on the lecures of [http://drorbn.net/dbnvp/12-267-120928.php Friday, September 28th] and [http://drorbn.net/dbnvp/12-267-121001.php Monday October 1st]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Lipschitz== |
|
Def. <math>f: \mathbb{R}_y \rightarrow \mathbb{R}</math> is called Lipschitz if <math>\exists \epsilon > 0, k > 0</math> (a Lipschitz constant of f) such that <math>|y_1 - y_2| < \epsilon \implies |f(y_1) - f(y_2)| \leq k |y_1 - y_2|</math>. |
|
'''Def.''' <math>f: \mathbb{R}_y \rightarrow \mathbb{R}</math> is called Lipschitz if <math>\exists \epsilon > 0, k > 0</math> (a Lipschitz constant of f) such that <math>|y_1 - y_2| < \epsilon \implies |f(y_1) - f(y_2)| \leq k |y_1 - y_2|</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
Note that any function that is Lipschitz is uniformly continuous, and that if a function f and its derivative are both continous on a compact set then f is Lipschitz. |
|
Note that any function that is Lipschitz is uniformly continuous, and that if a function f and its derivative are both continous on a compact set then f is Lipschitz. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thm. Existence and Uniqueness Theorem for ODEs
|
|
==Statement of Existence and Uniqueness Theorem== |
|
|
'''Thm.''' Existence and Uniqueness Theorem for ODEs |
|
|
|
|
|
Let <math>f:\mathbb{R} = [x_0 - a, x_0 + a] \times [y_0 - b, y_0 + b] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}</math> be continuous and uniformly Lipschitz relative to y. Then the equation <math>\Phi' = f(x, \Phi)</math> with <math> \Phi(x_0) = y_0</math> has a unique solution <math>\Phi : [x_0 - \delta, x_0 + \delta] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}</math> where <math>\delta = min(a, ^b/_M)</math> where M is a bound of f on <math>\mathbb{R}</math>. |
|
Let <math>f:\mathbb{R} = [x_0 - a, x_0 + a] \times [y_0 - b, y_0 + b] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}</math> be continuous and uniformly Lipschitz relative to y. Then the equation <math>\Phi' = f(x, \Phi)</math> with <math> \Phi(x_0) = y_0</math> has a unique solution <math>\Phi : [x_0 - \delta, x_0 + \delta] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}</math> where <math>\delta = min(a, ^b/_M)</math> where M is a bound of f on <math>\mathbb{R}</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
|
|
This is proven by showing the equation <math>\Phi(x) = y_0 + \int_{x_0}^x f(t, \Phi(t))dt</math> exists, given the noted assumptions. |
|
This is proven by showing the equation <math>\Phi(x) = y_0 + \int_{x_0}^x f(t, \Phi(t))dt</math> exists, given the noted assumptions. |
|
|
|
|
|
Let <math>\Phi_0(x) = y_0</math> and let <math>\Phi_n(x) = y_0 + \int_{x_0}^x f(t, \Phi_{n-1}(t))dt</math>. |
|
Let <math>\Phi_0(x) = y_0</math> and let <math>\Phi_n(x) = y_0 + \int_{x_0}^x f(t, \Phi_{n-1}(t))dt</math>. IF we can prove the following three claims, we have proven the theorem. The proofs of these claims will follow below. |
|
|
|
|
|
Claim 1: <math>\Phi_n</math> is well-defined. More precisely, <math>\Phi_n</math> is continuous and <math>\forall x \in [x_0 - \delta, x_0 + \delta]</math>, <math>|\Phi_n(x) - y_0| \leq b</math> where b is as referred to above. |
|
'''Claim 1''': <math>\Phi_n</math> is well-defined. More precisely, <math>\Phi_n</math> is continuous and <math>\forall x \in [x_0 - \delta, x_0 + \delta]</math>, <math>|\Phi_n(x) - y_0| \leq b</math> where b is as referred to above. |
|
|
|
|
|
Claim 2: For <math>n \geq 1</math>, <math>|\Phi_n(x) - \Phi_{n-1}(x)| \leq \frac{Mk^{n-1}}{n!} |x-x_0|^n</math>. |
|
'''Claim 2''': For <math>n \geq 1</math>, <math>|\Phi_n(x) - \Phi_{n-1}(x)| \leq \frac{Mk^{n-1}}{n!} |x-x_0|^n</math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
Claim 3: if <math> \Phi_n(x)</math> is a series of functions such that <math>|\Phi_n(x) - \Phi_{n-1}(x)| < c_n</math>, with <math>\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n</math> equal to some finite number, then <math>\Phi_n</math> converges uniformly to some function <math>\Phi</math> |
|
'''Claim 3''': if <math> \Phi_n(x)</math> is a series of functions such that <math>|\Phi_n(x) - \Phi_{n-1}(x)| < c_n</math>, with <math>\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n</math> equal to some finite number, then <math>\Phi_n</math> converges uniformly to some function <math>\Phi</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
Using these three claims, we have shown that the solution <math>\Phi(x)</math> exists. The proofs of the claims are below. |
|
Using these three claims, we have shown that the solution <math>\Phi(x)</math> exists. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Proofs of Claims== |
⚫ |
|
|
|
⚫ |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
Suppose <math>\Phi</math> and <math>\Psi</math> are both solutions. Let <math>\Chi(x) = |\Phi(x) - \Psi(x)|</math>. |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
<math>\Chi(x) = |\Phi(x) - \Psi(x)| = |\int_{x_0}^x(f(x, \Phi(x)) - f(x, \Psi(x))) dx | \leq \int_{x_0}^x k|\Phi(x) - \Psi(x)| dx</math> |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
We have that <math>\Chi \leq k \int_{x_0}^x \Chi(x) dx</math> for some constant k, which means <math>\Chi' \leq k\Chi</math>, and that <math>\Chi(x) \geq 0</math>. |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
Let <math>U(x) = e^{-kx}\int_{x_0}^x \Chi(x) dx</math>. Note that <math>U(x_0) = 0</math> as in this case we are integrating over an empty set, and that U thus defined has <math>U(x) \geq 0</math>. Then |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
<math>U'(x) = -ke^{-kx}\int_{x_0}^x\Chi(x) dx + e^{-kx} \Chi(x) = e^{-kx}(\Chi(x) - k\int_{x_0}^x\Chi(x) dx) \leq 0</math> |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
Then <math>U(x_0) = 0 \and U'(x) = 0 \implies U(x) \leq 0</math>, and <math> 0 \leq U(x) \leq 0 \implies U(x) \equiv 0 \implies \Chi(x) \equiv 0 \implies \Phi(x) \equiv \Psi(x)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The statement is trivially true for <math>\Phi_0</math>. Assume the claim is true for <math>\Phi_{n-1}</math>. <math>\Phi_n</math> is continuous, being the integral of a continuous function. |
|
The statement is trivially true for <math>\Phi_0</math>. Assume the claim is true for <math>\Phi_{n-1}</math>. <math>\Phi_n</math> is continuous, being the integral of a continuous function. |
Line 57: |
Line 47: |
|
<math> \Box </math> |
|
<math> \Box </math> |
|
|
|
|
|
Proof of Claim 2: |
|
'''Proof of Claim 2''': |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |\Phi_n(x) - \Phi_{n-1}(x)|</math> |
|
<math> |\Phi_n(x) - \Phi_{n-1}(x)|</math> |
Line 63: |
Line 53: |
|
<math> = |\int_{x_0}^x f(t, \Phi_{n-1}(t))dt - \int_{x_0}^x f(t, \Phi_{n-2}(t))dt|</math> |
|
<math> = |\int_{x_0}^x f(t, \Phi_{n-1}(t))dt - \int_{x_0}^x f(t, \Phi_{n-2}(t))dt|</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> \leq | \int_{x_0}^x (f(t, \Phi_{n-1}(t) - f(t, \Phi_{n-2}(t))dt )dt |</math> |
|
<math> \leq | \int_{x_0}^x |f(t, \Phi_{n-1}(t)) - f(t, \Phi_{n-2}(t)) | dt |</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> \leq |\int_{x_0}^x k|\Phi_{n-1}(t) - \Phi_{n-2}(t)|dt|</math> |
|
<math> \leq |\int_{x_0}^x k|\Phi_{n-1}(t) - \Phi_{n-2}(t)|dt|</math> |
Line 77: |
Line 67: |
|
Note that the sequence <math> c_n = \frac{M k^{n-1}}{n!} |x-x_0|^n</math> has <math>\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n</math> equal to some finite number. |
|
Note that the sequence <math> c_n = \frac{M k^{n-1}}{n!} |x-x_0|^n</math> has <math>\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n</math> equal to some finite number. |
|
|
|
|
|
Proof of Claim 3: Assigned in [http://drorbn.net/index.php?title=12-267/Homework_Assignment_3 Homework 3, Task 1] |
|
'''Proof of Claim 3''': Assigned in [http://drorbn.net/index.php?title=12-267/Homework_Assignment_3 Homework 3, Task 1], see page for solutions. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Proof of Uniqueness== |
|
⚫ |
Suppose <math>\Phi</math> and <math>\Psi</math> are both solutions. Let <math>\Chi(x) = |\Phi(x) - \Psi(x)|</math>. |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
<math>\Chi(x) = |\Phi(x) - \Psi(x)| = |\int_{x_0}^x(f(x, \Phi(x)) - f(x, \Psi(x))) dx | \leq \int_{x_0}^x k|\Phi(x) - \Psi(x)| dx</math> |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
We have that <math>\Chi \leq k \int_{x_0}^x \Chi(x) dx</math> for some constant k, which means <math>\Chi' \leq k\Chi</math>, and that <math>\Chi(x) \geq 0</math>. |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
Let <math>U(x) = e^{-kx}\int_{x_0}^x \Chi(x) dx</math>. Note that <math>U(x_0) = 0</math> as in this case we are integrating over an empty set, and that U thus defined has <math>U(x) \geq 0</math>. Then |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
<math>U'(x) = -ke^{-kx}\int_{x_0}^x\Chi(x) dx + e^{-kx} \Chi(x) = e^{-kx}(\Chi(x) - k\int_{x_0}^x\Chi(x) dx) \leq 0</math> |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
Then <math>U(x_0) = 0 \and U'(x) = 0 \implies U(x) \leq 0</math>, and <math> 0 \leq U(x) \leq 0 \implies U(x) \equiv 0 \implies \Chi(x) \equiv 0 \implies \Phi(x) \equiv \Psi(x)</math>. |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
|
Additions to this web site no longer count towards good deed points.
|
#
|
Week of...
|
Notes and Links
|
1
|
Sep 10
|
About This Class. Monday: Introduction and the Brachistochrone. Tuesday: More on the Brachistochrone, administrative issues. Tuesday Notes. Friday: Some basic techniques: first order linear equations.
|
2
|
Sep 17
|
Monday: Separated equations, escape velocities. HW1. Tuesday: Escape velocities, changing source and target coordinates, homogeneous equations. Friday: Reverse engineering separated and exact equations.
|
3
|
Sep 24
|
Monday: Solving exact equations, integration factors. HW2. Tuesday: Statement of the Fundamental Theorem. Class Photo. Friday: Proof of the Fundamental Theorem.
|
4
|
Oct 1
|
Monday: Last notes on the fundamental theorem. HW3. Tuesday Hour 1: The chain law, examples of variational problems. Tuesday Hour 2: Deriving Euler-Lagrange. Friday: Reductions of Euler-Lagrange.
|
5
|
Oct 8
|
Monday is thanksgiving. Tuesday: Lagrange multiplyers and the isoperimetric inequality. HW4. Friday: More Lagrange multipliers, numerical methods.
|
6
|
Oct 15
|
Monday: Euler and improved Euler. Tuesday: Evaluating the local error, Runge-Kutta, and a comparison of methods. Friday: Numerical integration, high order constant coefficient homogeneous linear ODEs.
|
7
|
Oct 22
|
Monday: Multiple roots, reduction of order, undetermined coefficients. Tuesday: From systems to matrix exponentiation. HW5. Term Test on Friday.
|
8
|
Oct 29
|
Monday: The basic properties of matrix exponentiation. Tuesday: Matrix exponentiation: examples. Friday: Phase Portraits. HW6. Nov 4 was the last day to drop this class
|
9
|
Nov 5
|
Monday: Non-homogeneous systems. Tuesday: The Catalan numbers, power series, and ODEs. Friday: Global existence for linear ODEs, the Wronskian.
|
10
|
Nov 12
|
Monday-Tuesday is UofT November break. HW7. Friday: Series solutions for .
|
11
|
Nov 19
|
Monday: is irrational, more on the radius of convergence. Tuesday (class): Airy's equation, Fuchs' theorem. Tuesday (tutorial): Regular singular points. HW8. Friday: Discussion of regular singular points..
|
12
|
Nov 26
|
Monday: Frobenius series by computer. Qualitative Analysis Handout (PDF). Tuesday: The basic oscillation theorem. Handout on the Frobenius Method. HW9. Friday: Non-oscillation, Sturm comparison.
|
13
|
Dec 3
|
Monday: More Sturm comparisons, changing the independent variable. Tuesday: Amplitudes of oscillations. Last class was on Tuesday!
|
F1
|
Dec 10
|
|
F2
|
Dec 17
|
The Final Exam (time, place, style, office hours times)
|
Register of Good Deeds
|
Add your name / see who's in!
|
|
|
Disclamer: This is a student prepared note based on the lecures of Friday, September 28th and Monday October 1st.
Lipschitz
Def. is called Lipschitz if (a Lipschitz constant of f) such that .
Note that any function that is Lipschitz is uniformly continuous, and that if a function f and its derivative are both continous on a compact set then f is Lipschitz.
Statement of Existence and Uniqueness Theorem
Thm. Existence and Uniqueness Theorem for ODEs
Let be continuous and uniformly Lipschitz relative to y. Then the equation with has a unique solution where where M is a bound of f on .
Proof of Existence
This is proven by showing the equation exists, given the noted assumptions.
Let and let . IF we can prove the following three claims, we have proven the theorem. The proofs of these claims will follow below.
Claim 1: is well-defined. More precisely, is continuous and , where b is as referred to above.
Claim 2: For , .
Claim 3: if is a series of functions such that , with equal to some finite number, then converges uniformly to some function
Using these three claims, we have shown that the solution exists.
Proofs of Claims
Proof of Claim 1:
The statement is trivially true for . Assume the claim is true for . is continuous, being the integral of a continuous function.
Proof of Claim 2:
Note that the sequence has equal to some finite number.
Proof of Claim 3: Assigned in Homework 3, Task 1, see page for solutions.
Proof of Uniqueness
Suppose and are both solutions. Let .
We have that for some constant k, which means , and that .
Let . Note that as in this case we are integrating over an empty set, and that U thus defined has . Then
Then , and .