0708-1300/Questionnaire: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:


==Your Answers==
==Your Answers==
{{In Preparation}}


1. Here's a histogram of the responses to question 1:
1. Here's a histogram of the responses to question 1:
Line 56: Line 55:
* "[Move more slowly]".
* "[Move more slowly]".
* "Lectures are wonderful". (Repeated often, at different wording, some not as strong...).
* "Lectures are wonderful". (Repeated often, at different wording, some not as strong...).
* "I like how you suppress the technical details...".
* "I like how you suppress the technical details...". (Repeated).
* "Fascinating stuff".
* "Fascinating stuff".
* "Bredon's notation a bit unappealing".
* "Bredon's notation a bit unappealing".
Line 62: Line 61:


A larger issue quoted from a student:
A larger issue quoted from a student:
:"We need a rigor agreement. I mean, the rigor is always an agreement between the writer and the reader. In lectures, you are the writer and we are the readers but in exams and homeworks the situation is reversed. (TBC)
:"We need a rigor agreement. I mean, the rigor is always an agreement between the writer and the reader. In lectures, you are the writer and we are the readers but in exams and homeworks the situation is reversed.
:The question is: Are we allowed to use in exams and homeworks the same amount of rigor as you in lectures? If not, it is important to have a reference."
I ({{Dror}}) will discuss this point sometime later in class, definitely before the term exam.

Latest revision as of 14:51, 2 October 2007

My Questions

1. Rate this class on the following scale:

Pathetic 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Superb

2. Unless you rated the class "superb", be kind and offer suggestion(s) for improvement. You may also use this space for comments like "X is good, keep it the same way".

Announcements go here

Your Answers

1. Here's a histogram of the responses to question 1:

No Answer | XX
    4     | X
    5     | X
    6     | X
    7     | XXXXX (one was marked a bit above 7)
    8     | XXXXXXX (one was halfway to 9)
    9     | XXXXXX
  Superb  | XXXX

2. And here's a summary of the responses to question 2:

  • As a whole people like the class but find it difficult. Some even say "scary".
  • As a whole people like my teaching style.
  • Some find that I skip too many details.

Some quotes:

  • "I need constant reminders of definitions ... what we're doing, where we're trying to get to".
  • "I find lectures more confusing than the book".
  • "Pictures are nice but they aren't helpful if it's not clear what a picture is supposed to be representing".
  • "[Too] many things are taken for granted".
  • "Need more examples [at least one example/exercise per 2 weeks]". (Repeated).
  • "Class homepage is excellent".
  • "More office hours".
  • "More details".
  • "Good mix of examples and theorems".
  • "Class is interesting but difficult". (Repeated often, at different wording).
  • "A good pace...". (Repeated).
  • "You are very motivating!". (Repeated often, at different wording).
  • "Keep drawing pictures".
  • "The number of definitions is overwhelming".
  • "[Move more slowly]".
  • "Lectures are wonderful". (Repeated often, at different wording, some not as strong...).
  • "I like how you suppress the technical details...". (Repeated).
  • "Fascinating stuff".
  • "Bredon's notation a bit unappealing".
  • "Faster please".

A larger issue quoted from a student:

"We need a rigor agreement. I mean, the rigor is always an agreement between the writer and the reader. In lectures, you are the writer and we are the readers but in exams and homeworks the situation is reversed.
The question is: Are we allowed to use in exams and homeworks the same amount of rigor as you in lectures? If not, it is important to have a reference."

I (Dror) will discuss this point sometime later in class, definitely before the term exam.