0708-1300/Errata to Bredon's Book: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There is a counterexample to the inverse implication in Problem 1, p. 71. |
There is a counterexample to the inverse implication in Problem 1, p. 71. |
||
Let X=\mathbb R be endowed with the ordinary topology (thus, it is Hausdorff and second countable). Let U be an arbitrary connected open set in X (that is, an interval). Let F_X(U) consists of all functions identically equal to constant. If U is an arbitrary open set, then by theorem on structure of open sets in \mathbb R it is a union of countably many open intervals. We define F_X(U) to be the set of all real-valued functions which are constant on open intervals forming U. The family F=\{F_X(U):U is open in X\} forms a functional structure, as one can check. Furthermore, it satisfies the hypothesis of the theorem: every point x \in X has a |
Let <math>X=\mathbb</math> R be endowed with the ordinary topology (thus, it is Hausdorff and second countable). Let <math>U</math> be an arbitrary connected open set in <math>X</math> (that is, an interval). Let <math>F_X(U)</math> consists of all functions identically equal to constant. If <math>U</math> is an arbitrary open set, then by theorem on structure of open sets in <math>\mathbb R</math> it is a union of countably many open intervals. We define <math>F_X(U)</math> to be the set of all real-valued functions which are constant on open intervals forming <math>U</math>. The family <math>F=\{F_X(U):U is open in X\}</math> forms a functional structure, as one can check. Furthermore, it satisfies the hypothesis of the theorem: every point <math>x \in X</math> has a neighborhood (we take an open interval containing <math>x</math>) such that there exists a function <math>f \in F_X(U)</math> (we define it to be identically equal to <math>1</math>) such that a function <math>g:U \to \mathbb R</math> is in <math>F_X(U)</math> (it is identically equal to a constant by our definition) if and only if there exists a smooth function <math>h</math> such that <math>g=h \circ f</math> (if <math>g</math> is given, then we define <math>h(x)=g</math> for all <math>x</math>, if <math>f</math> is given, then we take arbitrary smooth <math>h:\mathbb R \to \mathbb R</math>, since <math>h \circ f</math> is identically equal to constant and, thus, is in <math>F_X(U)</math>). Clearly, <math>(X,F_X)</math> is not a smooth manifold. |
Revision as of 08:39, 27 September 2007
Errata to Bredn's Book
There is a counterexample to the inverse implication in Problem 1, p. 71.
Let Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle X=\mathbb} R be endowed with the ordinary topology (thus, it is Hausdorff and second countable). Let be an arbitrary connected open set in (that is, an interval). Let consists of all functions identically equal to constant. If is an arbitrary open set, then by theorem on structure of open sets in it is a union of countably many open intervals. We define to be the set of all real-valued functions which are constant on open intervals forming . The family forms a functional structure, as one can check. Furthermore, it satisfies the hypothesis of the theorem: every point has a neighborhood (we take an open interval containing ) such that there exists a function (we define it to be identically equal to ) such that a function is in (it is identically equal to a constant by our definition) if and only if there exists a smooth function such that (if is given, then we define for all , if is given, then we take arbitrary smooth , since is identically equal to constant and, thus, is in ). Clearly, is not a smooth manifold.