AKT-09/HW1: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{AKT-09/Navigation}}
{{AKT-09/Navigation}}


'''Solve the following problems''' and submit them in class by October 13, 2006:
'''Solve the following problems''' and submit them in class by October 13, 2009:


'''Problem 1.''' If <math>f \in {\mathcal V}_n</math> and <math>g \in {\mathcal V}_m</math> then <math>f \cdot g \in {\mathcal V}_{n+m}</math> (as what one would expect by looking at degrees of polynomials) and <math>W_{f \cdot g} = m_\mathbb{Q} \circ (W_f \otimes W_g) \circ \Delta</math> where <math>(W_f \otimes W_g) \circ \Delta: {\mathcal A} \rightarrow \mathbb{Q} \otimes \mathbb{Q}</math> and <math>m_\mathbb{Q}</math> is the multiplication of rationals. (See {{AKT-09/vps|0924-2}}, minute 36:01).
'''Problem 1.''' If <math>f \in {\mathcal V}_n</math> and <math>g \in {\mathcal V}_m</math> then <math>f \cdot g \in {\mathcal V}_{n+m}</math> (as what one would expect by looking at degrees of polynomials) and <math>W_{f \cdot g} = m_\mathbb{Q} \circ (W_f \otimes W_g) \circ \Box</math> where <math>(W_f \otimes W_g) \circ \Box: {\mathcal A} \rightarrow \mathbb{Q} \otimes \mathbb{Q}</math> and <math>m_\mathbb{Q}</math> is the multiplication of rationals. (See {{AKT-09/vps|0924-2}}, minute 36:01).


'''Problem 2.''' Let <math>\Theta:{\mathcal A}\to{\mathcal A}</math> be the multiplication operator by the 1-chord diagram <math>\theta</math>, and let <math>\partial_\theta=\frac{d}{d\theta}</math> be the adjoint of multiplication by <math>W_\theta</math> on <math>{\mathcal A}^\star</math>, where <math>W_\theta</math> is the obvious dual of <math>\theta</math> in <math>{\mathcal A}^\star</math>. Let <math>P:{\mathcal A}\to{\mathcal A}</math> be defined by
'''Problem 2.''' Let <math>\Theta:{\mathcal A}\to{\mathcal A}</math> be the multiplication operator by the 1-chord diagram <math>\theta</math>, and let <math>\partial_\theta=\frac{d}{d\theta}</math> be the adjoint of multiplication by <math>W_\theta</math> on <math>{\mathcal A}^\star</math>, where <math>W_\theta</math> is the obvious dual of <math>\theta</math> in <math>{\mathcal A}^\star</math>. Let <math>P:{\mathcal A}\to{\mathcal A}</math> be defined by
Line 22: Line 22:
# <math>P</math> descends to a Hopf algebra morphism <math>{\mathcal A}^r\to{\mathcal A}</math>, and if <math>\pi:{\mathcal A}\to{\mathcal A}^r</math> is the obvious projection, then <math>\pi\circ P</math> is the identity of <math>{\mathcal A}^r</math>. (Recall that <math>{\mathcal A}^r={\mathcal A}/\langle\theta\rangle</math>).
# <math>P</math> descends to a Hopf algebra morphism <math>{\mathcal A}^r\to{\mathcal A}</math>, and if <math>\pi:{\mathcal A}\to{\mathcal A}^r</math> is the obvious projection, then <math>\pi\circ P</math> is the identity of <math>{\mathcal A}^r</math>. (Recall that <math>{\mathcal A}^r={\mathcal A}/\langle\theta\rangle</math>).
# <math>P^2=P</math>.
# <math>P^2=P</math>.

'''Idea for a good deed.''' Later than October 13, prepare a [[AKT-09/Sol1|beautiful TeX writeup]] (including the motivation and all the details) of the solution of this assignment for publication on the web. For all I know this information in this form is not available elsewhere.


'''Mandatory but unenforced.''' Find yourself in the class photo and identify yourself as explained in the [[AKT-09/Class Photo|photo page]].
'''Mandatory but unenforced.''' Find yourself in the class photo and identify yourself as explained in the [[AKT-09/Class Photo|photo page]].

Latest revision as of 12:00, 19 October 2009

Solve the following problems and submit them in class by October 13, 2009:

Problem 1. If and then (as what one would expect by looking at degrees of polynomials) and where and is the multiplication of rationals. (See 090924-2, minute 36:01).

Problem 2. Let be the multiplication operator by the 1-chord diagram , and let be the adjoint of multiplication by on , where is the obvious dual of in . Let be defined by

Verify the following assertions, but submit only your work on assertions 4,5,7,11:

  1. , where is the identity map and where for any two operators.
  2. is a degree operator; that is, for all .
  3. satisfies Leibnitz' law: for any .
  4. is an algebra morphism: and .
  5. satisfies the co-Leibnitz law: (why does this deserve the name "the co-Leibnitz law"?).
  6. is a co-algebra morphism: (where is the co-unit of ) and .
  7. and hence , where is the ideal generated by in the algebra .
  8. If is defined by
    then for all .
  9. .
  10. descends to a Hopf algebra morphism , and if is the obvious projection, then is the identity of . (Recall that ).
  11. .

Idea for a good deed. Later than October 13, prepare a beautiful TeX writeup (including the motivation and all the details) of the solution of this assignment for publication on the web. For all I know this information in this form is not available elsewhere.

Mandatory but unenforced. Find yourself in the class photo and identify yourself as explained in the photo page.

AKT-09-ClassPhoto.jpg