14-240/Tutorial-November4: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 39: Line 39:
'''Boris's Section Only'''
'''Boris's Section Only'''


If you use in your proof '''Corollary 1 of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra''', then please cite as "Corollary 1 of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra". Do not cite it as the "Fundamental Theorem of Algebra" since that means you are citing the fundamental theorem instead of its corollary.
If you use in your proof '''Corollary 1 of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra''', then please cite it as "Corollary 1 of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra". Do not cite it as the "Fundamental Theorem of Algebra" since that means you are citing the fundamental theorem instead of its corollary.


==Nikita==
==Nikita==

Latest revision as of 18:49, 30 November 2014

Boris

Question 26 on Page 57 in Homework 5

Let and be a subspace of . Find .


First, let . Then we can decompose since there is a such that . From here, there are several approaches:


Approach 1: Use Isomorphisms


We show that is isomorphic to . Let be the standard ordered basis of and be a subset of . Then there is a unique linear transformation such that where . Show that is both one-to-one and onto and conclude that .


Approach 2: Use the Rank-Nullity Theorem


Let be the standard ordered basis of and . Then where and . Define by . Then it is easy to show that is both well-defined and linear. Afterwards, show that and use the rank-nullity theorem to conclude that .


Approach 3: Find a Basis with the Decomposed Polynomial


This approach is straightforward. Show that is a basis of .


Approach 4: Find a Basis without the Decomposed Polynomial


This approach requires a little more cleverness when constructing the basis: .


Cite Carefully

Boris's Section Only

If you use in your proof Corollary 1 of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, then please cite it as "Corollary 1 of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra". Do not cite it as the "Fundamental Theorem of Algebra" since that means you are citing the fundamental theorem instead of its corollary.

Nikita