06-1350/Class Notes for Tuesday October 10: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{06-1350/Navigation}}
{{06-1350/Navigation}}


[[Image:PlasticTrinions.jpg|thumb|left|150px|Plastic trinions]]
'''Question.''' Can you embed a trinion (a.k.a. a sphere with three holes, a pair of pants, or a band theta graph) in <math>{\mathbb R}^3</math> so that each boundary component would be unknotted yet each pair of boundary components would be knotted?
'''Question 1.''' Can you embed a trinion (a.k.a. a sphere with three holes, a pair of pants, or a band theta graph) in <math>{\mathbb R}^3</math> so that each boundary component would be unknotted yet each pair of boundary components would be knotted? How about, so that at least one pair of boundary components would be knotted?


'''Question 2.''' Suppose two trinions <math>\gamma_1</math> and <math>\gamma_2</math> are knotted so that the pushforwards <math>\gamma_{1\star}L</math> and <math>\gamma_{2\star}L</math> are equal for any link <math>L</math> which is "drawn" on the parameter space <math>\Gamma</math> of <math>\gamma_1</math> and <math>\gamma_2</math>. Does it follow that <math>\gamma_1</math> and <math>\gamma_2</math> are equivalent?
[[Image:PlasticTrinions.jpg|thumb|center|250px|Plastic trinions]]

'''Question 3.''' A trinion <math>\gamma</math> is embedded in <math>{\mathbb R}^3</math> so that its boundary is the trivial 3-component link. Does it follow that <math>\gamma</math> is trivial?

'''Question 4.''' A trinion <math>\gamma</math> is embedded in <math>{\mathbb R}^3</math> so that its "strapped boundary" is equivalent to the strapped boundary of the trivially embedded trinion. Does it follow that <math>\gamma</math> is trivial?

[[Image:StrappedTrinion.svg|thumb|center|200px|The standardly embedded strapped trinion]]

Revision as of 18:52, 9 October 2006

Plastic trinions

Question 1. Can you embed a trinion (a.k.a. a sphere with three holes, a pair of pants, or a band theta graph) in so that each boundary component would be unknotted yet each pair of boundary components would be knotted? How about, so that at least one pair of boundary components would be knotted?

Question 2. Suppose two trinions and are knotted so that the pushforwards and are equal for any link which is "drawn" on the parameter space of and . Does it follow that and are equivalent?

Question 3. A trinion is embedded in so that its boundary is the trivial 3-component link. Does it follow that is trivial?

Question 4. A trinion is embedded in so that its "strapped boundary" is equivalent to the strapped boundary of the trivially embedded trinion. Does it follow that is trivial?

The standardly embedded strapped trinion