Notes for AKT-140106/0:43:23

From Drorbn
Revision as of 10:53, 15 May 2018 by Cameron.martin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "'''Claim:''' The number of legal 3-colorings of a knot diagram is always a power of 3. This is an expansion on the proof given by Przytycki (https://arxiv.org/abs/math/06081...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Claim: The number of legal 3-colorings of a knot diagram is always a power of 3.


This is an expansion on the proof given by Przytycki (https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0608172).


We'll show that the set of legal 3-colorings forms a subgroup of , for some r, which suffices to prove the claim. First, label each of the segments of the given diagram 1 through n, and denote a 3-coloring of this diagram by , where each is an element of the cyclic group of order 3 (each element representing a different colour). It is clear that is a subset of . To show it is a subgroup, we'll take , and show that . It suffices to restrict our attention to one crossing in the given diagram, so we can without loss of generality let n = 3.


First, we (sub)claim that a crossing (involving colours is legal if and only if in . Indeed, if the crossing is legal, either it is the trivial crossing in which case their product is clearly 1, or each is distinct, in which case . Conversely, suppose , and suppose . It suffices to show that . This follows by case checking: if , then ; if , then , implying that ; and if , then , implying that . Thus, the subclaim is proven.


As a result, satisfies since both . This implies that , and hence shows that is a subgroup of for n = the number of line segments in the diagram. By Lagrange's theorem, the number of legal 3-colorings (the order of ) is a power of 3.