(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
On 10/28/16, we discussed the following problem:
Suppose is with for all .
Prove that is not invertible.
Let . At the end of the tutorial, a couple of students pointed out that it's also true that is not invertible for any . It's easy to check that when and that is in the kernel of .
It takes some more care to prove what the problem is asking because one can't immediately deduce that has non-trivial kernel with . A key observation here is that since is , invertibility of at implies invertibility of at a neighborhood of .