Notes for AKT-170317/0:10:47: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Here's a way to think about quantum groups: they are integrable quantum mechanical systems that live on Lie groups. |
Here's a way to think about quantum groups: they are integrable quantum mechanical systems that live on Lie groups. |
||
To make sense of this let's first upgrade our 4d Lie algebra to a Lie group, call it G_0. |
To make sense of this let's first upgrade our 4d Lie algebra g_0 to a Lie group, call it G_0. |
||
I'm not sure it was mentioned in the course but g_0 is not just a Lie algebra, it is also a Lie bialgebra. |
I'm not sure it was mentioned in the course but g_0 is not just a Lie algebra, it is also a Lie bialgebra. |
||
(it has a compatible bracket on the dual the trivial one in the case of g_0). |
|||
Translating this to G_0 makes G_0 a Poisson manifold. That means there is a Poisson bracket on the space of functions |
Translating this to G_0 makes G_0 a Poisson manifold. That means there is a Poisson bracket on the space of functions |
||
F(G_0). Given such a Poisson bracket {.,.} and a Hamiltonian function $H |
F(G_0). Given such a Poisson bracket {.,.} and a Hamiltonian function $H\in F(G_0)$ is enough to write the equations of motion |
||
on G_0. They are df/dt = {f,H} |
on G_0. They are $df/dt = {f,H}$ |
||
With all this in place we can first remark the fact that our r-matrix is closely related to the bialgebra structure and CYBE |
|||
to be a condition for integrability of the classical mechanical system. |
|||
Next we may quantize with respect to the Poisson structure to obtain a deformation of the algebra of functions F_h(G_0). |
|||
It's easier to pass to the Lie-group G_0 that corresponds to |
|||
We would then like to think of this non-commutative algebra as the algebra of functions on the (non-existent) quantum group. |
|||
Integrability survives the quantization and is now expressed in terms of the R-matrix satisfying Yang-Baxter. |
|||
Dually one may also consider universal enveloping algebra and its deformation as a Hopf algebra. |
|||
Quantizing often seems a little ad-hoc but Kontsevich gave a general procedure for (deformation) quantizing with respect to |
|||
any Poisson structure. [http://www.ihes.fr/~maxim/TEXTS/DefQuant_final.pdf] |
|||
A reference for such things would be A guide to quantum groups by Chari and Pressley. |
|||
{{Roland}} |
{{Roland}} |
Revision as of 13:55, 18 March 2017
Here's a way to think about quantum groups: they are integrable quantum mechanical systems that live on Lie groups. To make sense of this let's first upgrade our 4d Lie algebra g_0 to a Lie group, call it G_0. I'm not sure it was mentioned in the course but g_0 is not just a Lie algebra, it is also a Lie bialgebra. (it has a compatible bracket on the dual the trivial one in the case of g_0). Translating this to G_0 makes G_0 a Poisson manifold. That means there is a Poisson bracket on the space of functions F(G_0). Given such a Poisson bracket {.,.} and a Hamiltonian function $H\in F(G_0)$ is enough to write the equations of motion on G_0. They are $df/dt = {f,H}$ With all this in place we can first remark the fact that our r-matrix is closely related to the bialgebra structure and CYBE to be a condition for integrability of the classical mechanical system. Next we may quantize with respect to the Poisson structure to obtain a deformation of the algebra of functions F_h(G_0). We would then like to think of this non-commutative algebra as the algebra of functions on the (non-existent) quantum group. Integrability survives the quantization and is now expressed in terms of the R-matrix satisfying Yang-Baxter. Dually one may also consider universal enveloping algebra and its deformation as a Hopf algebra.
Quantizing often seems a little ad-hoc but Kontsevich gave a general procedure for (deformation) quantizing with respect to any Poisson structure. [1]
A reference for such things would be A guide to quantum groups by Chari and Pressley. Roland