Notes for AKT-170217/0:03:07: Difference between revisions
From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "<math>g_0</math> may be the 0th in the class of Lie algebras we're playing with but its enveloping algebra can be made simpler still. Consider the algebra H obtained from <ma...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Consider the algebra H obtained from <math>U(g_0)</math> by inverting h and quotienting by the relation <math>l=-ef/h</math> |
Consider the algebra H obtained from <math>U(g_0)</math> by inverting h and quotienting by the relation <math>l=-ef/h</math> |
||
(check that <math>l+ef/h</math> is a central element in <math>U(g_0)</math>). And while we're at it, why not scale out the h entirely? |
(check that <math>l+ef/h</math> is a central element in <math>U(g_0)</math>). And while we're at it, why not scale out the h entirely? |
||
Does H reproduce the theory of <math>\Gamma</math> calculus? |
|||
Also, the screen is impossible to see on video but the accompanying mathematica file makes up for it twice. |
Also, the screen is impossible to see on video but the accompanying mathematica file makes up for it twice. |
||
{{Roland}} |
{{Roland}} |
||
Revision as of 17:17, 17 February 2017
may be the 0th in the class of Lie algebras we're playing with but its enveloping algebra can be made simpler still. Consider the algebra H obtained from by inverting h and quotienting by the relation (check that is a central element in ). And while we're at it, why not scale out the h entirely? Does H reproduce the theory of calculus? Also, the screen is impossible to see on video but the accompanying mathematica file makes up for it twice. Roland
