Notes for AKT-170113/0:50:48: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Roland}} At 38:12 Dror mentions a solution to CYBE already gives a knot invariant by setting <math>R = 1 + hr + \frac{1}{2!}h^2r^2</math> and working modulo <math >h^3 </math>.
{{Roland}} At 38:12 Dror mentions a solution to CYBE already gives a knot invariant by setting <math>R = 1 + hr + \frac{1}{2!}h^2r^2</math> and working modulo <math >h^3 </math>.
I put the <math>h^2</math> term to make the inverse <math>R^{-1}</math> be identical but with negative <math>h</math>, the factorial is just a hint of more to come.
Notice I added the <math>h^2</math> term to make the inverse <math>R^{-1}</math> be identical but with negative <math>h</math>, the factorial is just for fun.
I thought it was fun to have an example of this in <math>U(sl_2)</math> where you can check that <math>r_{ij} = E_iF_j + \frac{1}{4} H_iH_j</math> is a solution to CYBE.
I wanted to test this idea in <math>U(sl_2)</math> where you can check that <math>r_{ij} = E_iF_j + \frac{1}{4} H_iH_j</math> is a solution to CYBE.
If I got it right the positive Reidemeister 1 curl yields the value <math>1+ h(EF+\frac{1}{4}H^2)+\frac{1}{2}h^2(2E^2F^2 + EH^2F+EFH+\frac{H^4}{8})</math> bad news, we need the element <math>S</math> to get an invariant in this case.
If I got it right the positive Reidemeister 1 curl yields the value <math>1+ h(EF+\frac{1}{4}H^2)+\frac{1}{2}h^2(2E^2F^2 + EH^2F+EFH+\frac{H^4}{8})</math> bad news, we need the element <math>S</math> to get an invariant in this case.
Taking <math>\tilde{r}_{ij} = r_{ij}+r_{ji}</math> we may do a little better in that now the curl yields <math>1+ h(EF+FE+\frac{1}{2}H^2)+\mathcal{O}(h^2)</math>
indicating our ambiguity may now be a central element (the Casimir at order h).

Revision as of 08:18, 14 January 2017

Roland At 38:12 Dror mentions a solution to CYBE already gives a knot invariant by setting and working modulo . Notice I added the term to make the inverse be identical but with negative , the factorial is just for fun. I wanted to test this idea in where you can check that is a solution to CYBE. If I got it right the positive Reidemeister 1 curl yields the value bad news, we need the element to get an invariant in this case. Taking we may do a little better in that now the curl yields indicating our ambiguity may now be a central element (the Casimir at order h).