Notes for AKT-170113/0:50:48: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "{{Roland}} At 38:12 Dror mentions a solution to CYBE already gives a knot invariant by setting <math>R = 1 + hr + \frac{1}{2!}h^2r^2</math> and working modulo <math >h^3 </mat...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Roland}} At 38:12 Dror mentions a solution to CYBE already gives a knot invariant by setting <math>R = 1 + hr + \frac{1}{2!}h^2r^2</math> and working modulo <math >h^3 </math>.
{{Roland}} At 38:12 Dror mentions a solution to CYBE already gives a knot invariant by setting <math>R = 1 + hr + \frac{1}{2!}h^2r^2</math> and working modulo <math >h^3 </math>.
I put the <math>h^2</math> term to make the inverse <math>R^{-1}</math> be identical but with negative <math>h</math>, the factorial is just a hint of more to come.
I put the <math>h^2</math> term to make the inverse <math>R^{-1}</math> be identical but with negative <math>h</math>, the factorial is just a hint of more to come.
I thought it was fun to have an example of this in <math>U(sl_2)</math> where you can check that <math>r_{12} = E_1F_2 + \frac{1}{4} H_1H_2</math> is a solution to CYBE.
I thought it was fun to have an example of this in <math>U(sl_2)</math> where you can check that <math>r_{ij} = E_iF_j + \frac{1}{4} H_iH_j</math> is a solution to CYBE.

Revision as of 07:22, 14 January 2017

Roland At 38:12 Dror mentions a solution to CYBE already gives a knot invariant by setting [math]\displaystyle{ R = 1 + hr + \frac{1}{2!}h^2r^2 }[/math] and working modulo [math]\displaystyle{ h^3 }[/math]. I put the [math]\displaystyle{ h^2 }[/math] term to make the inverse [math]\displaystyle{ R^{-1} }[/math] be identical but with negative [math]\displaystyle{ h }[/math], the factorial is just a hint of more to come. I thought it was fun to have an example of this in [math]\displaystyle{ U(sl_2) }[/math] where you can check that [math]\displaystyle{ r_{ij} = E_iF_j + \frac{1}{4} H_iH_j }[/math] is a solution to CYBE.