Notes for AKT-140303/0:48:28: Difference between revisions
From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes n}$ |
After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes n}$ arises from a $W_{\mathfrak g}$-like construction". See also {{Home link|People/Haviv/S3g.pdf|Haviv's note}}, where a ''symmetric'' invariant tensor in ${\mathfrak g}^3$ is described for ${\mathfrak g}=sl(n)$, $n\geq 3$. Yet it is known that every "diagrammatic" element of ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes 3}$ is anti-symmetric. |
||
Revision as of 11:44, 3 March 2014
After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes n}$ arises from a $W_{\mathfrak g}$-like construction". See also Haviv's note, where a symmetric invariant tensor in ${\mathfrak g}^3$ is described for ${\mathfrak g}=sl(n)$, $n\geq 3$. Yet it is known that every "diagrammatic" element of ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes 3}$ is anti-symmetric.
