11-1100/Errata to Prof. Selick's Notes: Difference between revisions
From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
Josh.seaton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Josh.seaton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
pg 26: mentions two groups being "isometric" instead of being "isomorphic" (''mid-page'') |
'''pg 26''': mentions two groups being "isometric" instead of being "isomorphic" (''mid-page'') |
||
pg 28: Prop. 1.8.6 is missing the hypothesis that H \cap K = {e} |
'''pg 28''': Prop. 1.8.6 is missing the hypothesis that H \cap K = {e} |
||
page 33: |
'''page 33''': |
||
- a 'P' appears in lieu of 'S' (''third last line'') |
- a 'P' appears in lieu of 'S' (''third last line'') |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
pg 34: in Lemma 1.9.6, above the second appearance of the class equation for X, it reads S = |P| as opposed to S = P |
'''pg 34''': in Lemma 1.9.6, above the second appearance of the class equation for X, it reads S = |P| as opposed to S = P |
||
Revision as of 11:39, 23 October 2011
The following are a few minor mistakes I've noticed going the notes.
I. GROUPS
pg 26: mentions two groups being "isometric" instead of being "isomorphic" (mid-page)
pg 28: Prop. 1.8.6 is missing the hypothesis that H \cap K = {e}
page 33:
- a 'P' appears in lieu of 'S' (third last line)
- '|SP|' appears where 'SP' should (third last line)
- instead of reading H \subset S, it reads H = S (last line)
pg 34: in Lemma 1.9.6, above the second appearance of the class equation for X, it reads S = |P| as opposed to S = P
