Notes for AKT-090922/0:09:27: Difference between revisions
From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*The original statement Dror made here was '<math>W_{j_n}</math> of any chord diagram is, you '''EITHER''' replace a chord with a bridge '''OR''' you replace it with <math>-2</math> times a nothing' |
*The original statement Dror made here was '<math>W_{j_n}</math> of any chord diagram is, you '''EITHER''' replace a chord with a bridge '''OR''' you replace it with <math>-2</math> times a nothing' |
||
I think a more accurate wording would be '<math>W_{j_n}</math> of any chord diagram <math>= W_{j_n}</math> of the diagram with a chord replaced with a bridge <math> - 2 \times W_{j_n}</math> of the diagram with the same chord removed' |
I think a more accurate wording would be '<math>W_{j_n}</math> of any chord diagram <math>= W_{j_n}</math> of the diagram with a chord replaced with a bridge <math> - 2 \times W_{j_n}</math> of the diagram with the same chord removed'. |
||
DROR: PLEASE CHECK THIS AND CORRECT ME IF MY GUESS WAS WRONG. |
|||
Latest revision as of 05:05, 23 September 2009
- The original statement Dror made here was '[math]\displaystyle{ W_{j_n} }[/math] of any chord diagram is, you EITHER replace a chord with a bridge OR you replace it with [math]\displaystyle{ -2 }[/math] times a nothing'
I think a more accurate wording would be '[math]\displaystyle{ W_{j_n} }[/math] of any chord diagram [math]\displaystyle{ = W_{j_n} }[/math] of the diagram with a chord replaced with a bridge [math]\displaystyle{ - 2 \times W_{j_n} }[/math] of the diagram with the same chord removed'.
