1617-257/HW-5: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "J.I. graded problem 5 from section 8. Many employed the inverse function theorem (IFT) inappropriately here (injectivity is a requirement for the statement of the IFT - otherw...")
 
(Blanked the page)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
J.I. graded problem 5 from section 8. Many employed the inverse function theorem (IFT) inappropriately here (injectivity is a requirement for the statement of the IFT - otherwise, the conclusion that the function in question is invertible doesn't make sense in the first place).

Latest revision as of 17:49, 1 November 2016