1617-257/TUT-R-2: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "We discussed the following on 9/22/16: (1) What are the dimensions of <math>\mathbb{R}^\infty</math> and <math>\mathbb{R}^\omega</math>? (2) Let <math>S</math> be a subset o...")
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
A student gave an for problem (2) which works fine if <math>S</math> is a closed set (it depended on the fact that <math>S' \subset S</math>).
A student gave an for problem (2) which works fine if <math>S</math> is a closed set (it depended on the fact that <math>S' \subset S</math>).


[A student pointed out that I used a definition for limit point which was different from (but also equivalent to) that given in the text. We've replaced any usage of the definition I originally used with the text's definition. We also discussed why the two definitions are equivalent in the Thursday tutorial that took place on 9/29/16.]
Here's what we would have done if we had extra time to discuss:


Let <math>\epsilon > 0</math> be given.
Let <math>\epsilon > 0</math> be given and let <math>x'' \in S''</math> be given.


Let <math>\{x_k\}_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \subset S'</math> be a sequence which converges to <math>x</math>.
Then there is some <math>x' \in S'</math> such that <math>\|x'' - x'\| < \epsilon/2.</math>


Then there is some <math>n</math> for which <math>\| x_n - x\| < \epsilon/2</math>.
There is also a point <math>x \in S</math> such that <math>\|x' - x \| < \epsilon/2.</math>


Since <math>x_n \in S'</math>, there is some <math>s \in S</math> such that <math>\|x_n - s\| < \epsilon/2</math>.
So <math>\|x - x''\| \leq \|x - x'\| + \|x' - x''\| < \epsilon.</math>


So <math>\|s - x\| \leq \|s - x_n \| + \|x_n - x\| < \epsilon.</math>
That is, <math>x \in S'.</math>

That is, <math>x \in S'</math>.

Latest revision as of 11:04, 30 September 2016

We discussed the following on 9/22/16:

(1) What are the dimensions of and ?

(2) Let be a subset of . Show that the set of limit points of , , is closed.




A student gave an for problem (2) which works fine if is a closed set (it depended on the fact that ).

[A student pointed out that I used a definition for limit point which was different from (but also equivalent to) that given in the text. We've replaced any usage of the definition I originally used with the text's definition. We also discussed why the two definitions are equivalent in the Thursday tutorial that took place on 9/29/16.]

Let be given and let be given.

Then there is some such that

There is also a point such that

So

That is,