1617-257/TUT-R-2: Difference between revisions
From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "We discussed the following on 9/22/16: (1) What are the dimensions of <math>\mathbb{R}^\infty</math> and <math>\mathbb{R}^\omega</math>? (2) Let <math>S</math> be a subset o...") |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
A student gave an for problem (2) which works fine if <math>S</math> is a closed set (it depended on the fact that <math>S' \subset S</math>). |
A student gave an for problem (2) which works fine if <math>S</math> is a closed set (it depended on the fact that <math>S' \subset S</math>). |
||
[A student pointed out that I used a definition for limit point which was different from (but also equivalent to) that given in the text. We've replaced any usage of the definition I originally used with the text's definition. We also discussed why the two definitions are equivalent in the Thursday tutorial that took place on 9/29/16.] |
|||
Here's what we would have done if we had extra time to discuss: |
|||
Let <math>\epsilon > 0</math> be given. |
Let <math>\epsilon > 0</math> be given and let <math>x'' \in S''</math> be given. |
||
Then there is some <math>x' \in S'</math> such that <math>\|x'' - x'\| < \epsilon/2.</math> |
|||
There is also a point <math>x \in S</math> such that <math>\|x' - x \| < \epsilon/2.</math> |
|||
So <math>\|x - x''\| \leq \|x - x'\| + \|x' - x''\| < \epsilon.</math> |
|||
That is, <math>x \in S'.</math> |
|||
That is, <math>x \in S'</math>. |
Latest revision as of 11:04, 30 September 2016
We discussed the following on 9/22/16:
(1) What are the dimensions of and ?
(2) Let be a subset of . Show that the set of limit points of , , is closed.
A student gave an for problem (2) which works fine if is a closed set (it depended on the fact that ).
[A student pointed out that I used a definition for limit point which was different from (but also equivalent to) that given in the text. We've replaced any usage of the definition I originally used with the text's definition. We also discussed why the two definitions are equivalent in the Thursday tutorial that took place on 9/29/16.]
Let be given and let be given.
Then there is some such that
There is also a point such that
So
That is,