Notes for AKT-090922/0:09:27: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
*The original statement Dror made here was '<math>W_J</math> of any chord diagram is, you '''EITHER''' replace a chord with a bridge '''OR''' you replace it with <math>-2</math> times a nothing'
*The original statement Dror made here was '<math>W_{j_n}</math> of any chord diagram is, you '''EITHER''' replace a chord with a bridge '''OR''' you replace it with <math>-2</math> times a nothing'


I think he actually meant '<math>W_J</math> of any chord diagram <math>= W_J</math> of the diagram with a chord replaced with a bridge <math> - 2 \times W_J</math> of the diagram with the same chord removed'
I think a more accurate wording would be '<math>W_{j_n}</math> of any chord diagram <math>= W_{j_n}</math> of the diagram with a chord replaced with a bridge <math> - 2 \times W_{j_n}</math> of the diagram with the same chord removed'


DROR: PLEASE CHECK THIS AND CORRECT ME IF MY GUESS WAS WRONG.
DROR: PLEASE CHECK THIS AND CORRECT ME IF MY GUESS WAS WRONG.

Revision as of 21:59, 22 September 2009

  • The original statement Dror made here was '[math]\displaystyle{ W_{j_n} }[/math] of any chord diagram is, you EITHER replace a chord with a bridge OR you replace it with [math]\displaystyle{ -2 }[/math] times a nothing'

I think a more accurate wording would be '[math]\displaystyle{ W_{j_n} }[/math] of any chord diagram [math]\displaystyle{ = W_{j_n} }[/math] of the diagram with a chord replaced with a bridge [math]\displaystyle{ - 2 \times W_{j_n} }[/math] of the diagram with the same chord removed'

DROR: PLEASE CHECK THIS AND CORRECT ME IF MY GUESS WAS WRONG.