Notes for BBS/LeeP-080222-115052.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Peter adds - Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of <math>L</math>. The second <math>\beta</math> should be <math>\beta(d,b)</math>, not <math>\beta(d,e)</math>, and
Peter adds:
the third <math>\beta</math> should be <math>\beta(b,d) f(e)</math> not <math>\beta(e,d)f(b)</math> or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right.

Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of <math>L</math>. The second <math>\beta</math> should be <math>\beta(d,b)</math>, not <math>\beta(d,e)</math>, and
the third beta should be <math>\beta(b,d) f(e)</math> not <math>\beta(e,d)f(b)</math> or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right.

Latest revision as of 09:21, 3 March 2008

Peter adds - Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of . The second should be , not , and the third should be not or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right.