Notes for BBS/LeeP-080222-115052.jpg: Difference between revisions
From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of <math>L</math>. The second <math>\beta</math> should be <math>\beta(d,b)</math>, not <math>\beta(d,e)</math>, and |
Peter adds - Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of <math>L</math>. The second <math>\beta</math> should be <math>\beta(d,b)</math>, not <math>\beta(d,e)</math>, and |
||
the third beta should be <math>\beta(b,d) f(e)</math> not <math>\beta(e,d)f(b)</math> or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right. |
the third <math>\beta</math> should be <math>\beta(b,d) f(e)</math> not <math>\beta(e,d)f(b)</math> or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right. |
||
Latest revision as of 09:21, 3 March 2008
Peter adds - Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of [math]\displaystyle{ L }[/math]. The second [math]\displaystyle{ \beta }[/math] should be [math]\displaystyle{ \beta(d,b) }[/math], not [math]\displaystyle{ \beta(d,e) }[/math], and the third [math]\displaystyle{ \beta }[/math] should be [math]\displaystyle{ \beta(b,d) f(e) }[/math] not [math]\displaystyle{ \beta(e,d)f(b) }[/math] or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right.
