Notes for BBS/LeeP-080222-115052.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of <math>L</math>. The second <math>\beta</math> should be <math>\beta(d,b)</math>, not <math>\beta(d,e)</math>, and
Peter adds - Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of <math>L</math>. The second <math>\beta</math> should be <math>\beta(d,b)</math>, not <math>\beta(d,e)</math>, and
the third beta should be <math>\beta(b,d) f(e)</math> not <math>\beta(e,d)f(b)</math> or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right.
the third <math>\beta</math> should be <math>\beta(b,d) f(e)</math> not <math>\beta(e,d)f(b)</math> or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right.

test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test
test

test

Latest revision as of 09:21, 3 March 2008

Peter adds - Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of . The second should be , not , and the third should be not or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right.