Notes for BBS/LeeP-080222-115052.jpg: Difference between revisions
From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of <math>L</math>. |
Peter adds - Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of <math>L</math>. The second <math>\beta</math> should be <math>\beta(d,b)</math>, not <math>\beta(d,e)</math>, and |
||
the third <math>\beta</math> should be <math>\beta(b,d) f(e)</math> not <math>\beta(e,d)f(b)</math> or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right. |
|||
seond beta should be |
|||
beta(d,b), not beta (d,e), and |
|||
the thrid beta should be |
|||
beta(b,d) f(e) |
|||
not beta(e,d)f(b) |
|||
or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right. |
|||
Latest revision as of 09:21, 3 March 2008
Peter adds - Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of . The second should be , not , and the third should be not or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right.
