Notes for BBS/LeeP-080222-115052.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Peter adds:

Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of <math>L</math>. The second <math>\beta</math> should be <math>\beta(d,b)</math>, not <math>\beta(d,e)</math>, and
Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of <math>L</math>. The second <math>\beta</math> should be <math>\beta(d,b)</math>, not <math>\beta(d,e)</math>, and
the third beta should be <math>\beta(b,d) f(e)</math> not <math>\beta(e,d)f(b)</math> or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right.
the third beta should be <math>\beta(b,d) f(e)</math> not <math>\beta(e,d)f(b)</math> or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right.

Revision as of 18:43, 2 March 2008

Peter adds:

Indeed there was a mistake in my formulas - the definition of . The second should be , not , and the third beta should be not or whatever I said earlier. The other stuff is right.