Talk:06-240/Homework Assignment 1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Reverted edit of 62.231.243.138, changed back to last version by Wongpak) |
||
(15 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I don't see why <math>a*a^2=1</math> implies <math>a=1</math>. --[[User:Drorbn|Drorbn]] 06:16, 22 September 2006 (EDT) |
I don't see why <math>a*a^2=1</math> implies <math>a=1</math>. --[[User:Drorbn|Drorbn]] 06:16, 22 September 2006 (EDT) |
||
because <math>b=a^{-1}=a^2</math>, if ab=1, why shouldn't <math>a |
because <math>b=a^{-1}=a^2</math>, if ab=1, why shouldn't <math>a*a^2=1</math>? |
||
But what's wrong with that? --[[User:Drorbn|Drorbn]] 17:16, 22 September 2006 (EDT) |
|||
Finally I'm registered.....ok, if <math>a*a^2=1</math>, then a=1,but a field cannot have identical elements.....or can it?.........btw why is your name shown here but mine not?...never used a wiki based site.... |
|||
Repeat: I don't see why <math>a*a^2=1</math> implies <math>a=1</math>. --[[User:Drorbn|Drorbn]] 03:24, 23 September 2006 (EDT) |
|||
er....since <math>a*a^2=a^3=1</math>, or am I right about <math>a*a^2=a^3</math>?....and what makes <math>a^3=1</math> except a=1?...sorry but please tell me where I got wrong......... |
|||
Well, OUR very own field has an element <math>a</math> for which <math>a^3=1</math> yet <math>a\neq 1</math>... --[[User:Drorbn|Drorbn]] 17:08, 23 September 2006 (EDT) |
|||
ok.....that's....very...convincing......I'll shut up... |
|||
You seem unhappy, but I actually meant what I said. The equality <math>a^3=1</math> in a general field does not imply the equality <math>a\neq 1</math> --- why would it? After all, <math>a^2=1</math> does not imply <math>a\neq 1</math> either. Here are two examples for fields in which there is an <math>a\neq 1</math> for which <math>a^3=1</math>: |
|||
# Our field and our <math>a</math>. |
|||
# The complex numbers <math>{\mathbb C}</math> and <math>a=-\frac12+\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}i</math>. |
|||
--[[User:Drorbn|Drorbn]] 17:38, 24 September 2006 (EDT) |
|||
Actually I guessed it had something to do with the field. But this concept is still new to me, I just can't convice myself a is not 1 when a*a*a=1...But that example of complex numbers is indeed very convincing....thank you for your patience :) |
|||
== Assigment 1 Solution == |
|||
I would appreciate if you may notify for any error. [[Media:Assignment 1 Ans.pdf|Assignment 1 Solution]]--[[User:Wongpak|Wongpak]] 08:28, 26 September 2006 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 01:16, 16 June 2007
What information should be included on the homework assignments besides the answers to the assignment? Is student name, Math 240, Homework Assignment 1 and date sufficient? MC
Yes. --Drorbn 14:50, 15 September 2006 (EDT)
Q4
i have a question on Q4. for the part a^-1=a^2, if it's true, then a*a^2=1, which makes a=1....but a can't be 1 right?
I don't see why implies . --Drorbn 06:16, 22 September 2006 (EDT)
because , if ab=1, why shouldn't ?
But what's wrong with that? --Drorbn 17:16, 22 September 2006 (EDT)
Finally I'm registered.....ok, if , then a=1,but a field cannot have identical elements.....or can it?.........btw why is your name shown here but mine not?...never used a wiki based site....
Repeat: I don't see why implies . --Drorbn 03:24, 23 September 2006 (EDT)
er....since , or am I right about ?....and what makes except a=1?...sorry but please tell me where I got wrong.........
Well, OUR very own field has an element for which yet ... --Drorbn 17:08, 23 September 2006 (EDT)
ok.....that's....very...convincing......I'll shut up...
You seem unhappy, but I actually meant what I said. The equality in a general field does not imply the equality --- why would it? After all, does not imply either. Here are two examples for fields in which there is an for which :
- Our field and our .
- The complex numbers and .
--Drorbn 17:38, 24 September 2006 (EDT)
Actually I guessed it had something to do with the field. But this concept is still new to me, I just can't convice myself a is not 1 when a*a*a=1...But that example of complex numbers is indeed very convincing....thank you for your patience :)
Assigment 1 Solution
I would appreciate if you may notify for any error. Assignment 1 Solution--Wongpak 08:28, 26 September 2006 (EDT)