Notes for AKT-140124/0:23:30: Difference between revisions
From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
Leo algknt (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Let <math>\Lambda</math> be a symmetric, positive definite, non-singular square matrix. Then we have the following: <math> <x - \Lambda^{-1} y, \Lambda(x - \Lambda^{-1}y)> = ...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Let <math>\Lambda</math> be a symmetric, positive definite, non-singular square matrix. Then we have the following: |
Let <math>\Lambda</math> be a symmetric, positive definite, non-singular square matrix. Then we have the following: |
||
<math> |
<math> \langle x - \Lambda^{-1} y, \Lambda(x - \Lambda^{-1}y)\rangle = <x,\Lambda x> - <x, y> -<\Lambda^{-1}y, \Lambda x> + <\Lambda^{-1}y,y> </math>. |
||
We have <math><\Lambda^{-1}y, \Lambda x> = <x,y> </math> and <math><\Lambda^{-1}y,y> = <y,\Lambda^{-1}y></math> since <math>\Lambda</math> is symmetric. |
We have <math><\Lambda^{-1}y, \Lambda x> = <x,y> </math> and <math><\Lambda^{-1}y,y> = <y,\Lambda^{-1}y></math> since <math>\Lambda</math> is symmetric. |
Revision as of 11:17, 14 June 2018
Let be a symmetric, positive definite, non-singular square matrix. Then we have the following:
.
We have and since is symmetric.
From the above, we see that