Notes for AKT-170110-1/0:43:57: Difference between revisions
From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "Kauffman often defines his bracket using the variable A, it is not invariant under Reidemeister 1, a positive curl spits out <math>-A^3</math>. Multiplying through the relati...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Kauffman often defines his bracket using the variable A, it is not invariant under Reidemeister 1, a positive curl spits out <math>-A^3</math>. |
Kauffman often defines his bracket using the variable <math>A</math>, it is not invariant under Reidemeister 1, a positive curl spits out <math>-A^3</math>. |
||
Multiplying through the relation for the <math>\pm</math> crossing by <math>-A^{\mp 3}</math> and |
Multiplying through the relation for the <math>\pm</math> crossing by <math>-A^{\mp 3}</math> and absorbing that factor into the crossing, |
||
<math>q = -A^{-2}</math> |
we get Dror's Kauffman bracket with <math>q = -A^{-2}</math>. {{Roland}} |
||
Latest revision as of 07:36, 11 January 2017
Kauffman often defines his bracket using the variable , it is not invariant under Reidemeister 1, a positive curl spits out . Multiplying through the relation for the crossing by and absorbing that factor into the crossing, we get Dror's Kauffman bracket with . Roland
