1617-257/HW-5: Difference between revisions
From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Comments''' |
'''Comments''' |
||
''' |
'''Z. graded 8-1'''. |
||
''' |
'''I. graded problem 8-5'''. Many employed the inverse function theorem (IFT) inappropriately here (injectivity is a requirement for the statement of the IFT - otherwise, the conclusion that the function in question is invertible doesn't make sense in the first place). Among other things, one could have either delved into a proof of the IFT or argued that the function is locally injective so that one can employ the IFT locally. |
||
Revision as of 16:31, 1 November 2016
General grading scheme
Two problems graded out of 15 points each.
Comments
Z. graded 8-1.
I. graded problem 8-5. Many employed the inverse function theorem (IFT) inappropriately here (injectivity is a requirement for the statement of the IFT - otherwise, the conclusion that the function in question is invertible doesn't make sense in the first place). Among other things, one could have either delved into a proof of the IFT or argued that the function is locally injective so that one can employ the IFT locally.
