1617-257/TUT-R-2: Difference between revisions
From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
A student gave an for problem (2) which works fine if <math>S</math> is a closed set (it depended on the fact that <math>S' \subset S</math>). |
A student gave an for problem (2) which works fine if <math>S</math> is a closed set (it depended on the fact that <math>S' \subset S</math>). |
||
[A student pointed out that I used a definition for limit point which was different from (but also equivalent to) that given in the text. We've replaced any usage of the definition I originally used with the text's definition. We also discussed why the two definitions are equivalent in the Thursday tutorial that took place on 9/29/16.] |
|||
Let <math>\epsilon > 0</math> be given and let <math>x'' \in S''</math> be given. |
Let <math>\epsilon > 0</math> be given and let <math>x'' \in S''</math> be given. |
Latest revision as of 11:04, 30 September 2016
We discussed the following on 9/22/16:
(1) What are the dimensions of and ?
(2) Let be a subset of . Show that the set of limit points of , , is closed.
A student gave an for problem (2) which works fine if is a closed set (it depended on the fact that ).
[A student pointed out that I used a definition for limit point which was different from (but also equivalent to) that given in the text. We've replaced any usage of the definition I originally used with the text's definition. We also discussed why the two definitions are equivalent in the Thursday tutorial that took place on 9/29/16.]
Let be given and let be given.
Then there is some such that
There is also a point such that
So
That is,