https://drorbn.net/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Notes_for_BBS%2FSevera-110126-095855.jpgNotes for BBS/Severa-110126-095855.jpg - Revision history2026-05-18T09:58:38ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.6https://drorbn.net/index.php?title=Notes_for_BBS/Severa-110126-095855.jpg&diff=10513&oldid=prevDrorbn at 14:36, 28 January 20112011-01-28T14:36:53Z<p></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>For the long term it would be a sin to accept the proof of Kontsevich's vanishing lemma as it is. A simple statement should have a simple transparent proof phrased within the same language. Also, this lemma is the obstruction to re-phrasing everything as a counting argument; understanding it may uncover an underlying counting argument.</div>Drorbn