Notes for AKT-140303/0:48:28 - Revision history

Drorbn at 13:43, 10 March 2014

2014-03-10T13:43:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:43, 10 March 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes n}$ arise from a $W_{\mathfrak g}$-like construction". See also {{Home link\|People/Haviv/S3g.pdf\|Haviv's note}}, where a ''symmetric'' invariant tensor in ${\mathfrak g}^3$ is described for ${\mathfrak g}=sl(n)$, $n\geq 3$. Yet it is known that every "diagrammatic" element of ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes 3}$ is anti-symmetric.		After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes n}$ arise from a $W_{\mathfrak g}$-like construction". See also {{Home link\|People/Haviv/S3g.pdf\|Haviv's note}}, where a ''symmetric'' invariant tensor in ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes 3}$ is described for ${\mathfrak g}=sl(n)$, $n\geq 3$. Yet it is known that every "diagrammatic" element of ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes 3}$ is anti-symmetric.

Drorbn at 17:12, 3 March 2014

2014-03-03T17:12:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 3 March 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes n}$ ~~arises~~ from a $W_{\mathfrak g}$-like construction". See also {{Home link\|People/Haviv/S3g.pdf\|Haviv's note}}, where a ''symmetric'' invariant tensor in ${\mathfrak g}^3$ is described for ${\mathfrak g}=sl(n)$, $n\geq 3$. Yet it is known that every "diagrammatic" element of ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes 3}$ is anti-symmetric.		After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes n}$ arise from a $W_{\mathfrak g}$-like construction". See also {{Home link\|People/Haviv/S3g.pdf\|Haviv's note}}, where a ''symmetric'' invariant tensor in ${\mathfrak g}^3$ is described for ${\mathfrak g}=sl(n)$, $n\geq 3$. Yet it is known that every "diagrammatic" element of ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes 3}$ is anti-symmetric.

Drorbn: Drorbn moved page Notes for AKT-140303/0:50:00 to Notes for AKT-140303/0:48:28

2014-03-03T17:11:26Z

Drorbn moved page Notes for AKT-140303/0:50:00 to Notes for AKT-140303/0:48:28

← Older revision

Revision as of 13:11, 3 March 2014

Drorbn at 16:44, 3 March 2014

2014-03-03T16:44:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 3 March 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes n}$ ~~arise~~ from a $W_{\mathfrak g}$-like construction". See also {{Home link\|People/Haviv/S3g.pdf\|Haviv's note}}, where a ''symmetric'' invariant tensor in ${\mathfrak g}^3$ is described for ${\mathfrak g}=sl(n)$, $n\geq 3$. Yet it is known that every "diagrammatic" element of ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes 3}$ is anti-symmetric.		After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes n}$ arises from a $W_{\mathfrak g}$-like construction". See also {{Home link\|People/Haviv/S3g.pdf\|Haviv's note}}, where a ''symmetric'' invariant tensor in ${\mathfrak g}^3$ is described for ${\mathfrak g}=sl(n)$, $n\geq 3$. Yet it is known that every "diagrammatic" element of ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes 3}$ is anti-symmetric.

Drorbn at 16:43, 3 March 2014

2014-03-03T16:43:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:43, 3 March 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^n$ arise from a $W_{\mathfrak g}$-like construction". See also {{Home link\|People/Haviv/S3g.pdf\|Haviv's note}}, where a ''symmetric'' invariant tensor in ${\mathfrak g}^3$ is described for ${\mathfrak g}=sl(n)$, $n\geq 3$. Yet it is known that every "diagrammatic" element of ${\mathfrak g}^3$ is anti-symmetric.		After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes n}$ arise from a $W_{\mathfrak g}$-like construction". See also {{Home link\|People/Haviv/S3g.pdf\|Haviv's note}}, where a ''symmetric'' invariant tensor in ${\mathfrak g}^3$ is described for ${\mathfrak g}=sl(n)$, $n\geq 3$. Yet it is known that every "diagrammatic" element of ${\mathfrak g}^{\otimes 3}$ is anti-symmetric.

Drorbn: Created page with "After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^n$ arise from a $W_{\mathfrak g}$-like construction". ..."

2014-03-03T16:38:51Z

Created page with "After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^n$ arise from a $W_{\mathfrak g}$-like construction". ..."

New page

After the end of the recording we had a further discussion of the fact that "not all invariant tensors in ${\mathfrak g}^n$ arise from a $W_{\mathfrak g}$-like construction". See also {{Home link|People/Haviv/S3g.pdf|Haviv's note}}, where a ''symmetric'' invariant tensor in ${\mathfrak g}^3$ is described for ${\mathfrak g}=sl(n)$, $n\geq 3$. Yet it is known that every "diagrammatic" element of ${\mathfrak g}^3$ is anti-symmetric.