
{\def\s{$\sim$} \begin{center}\begin{tabular}{|r|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
\tl{n}&		$n$&				$\leq 10$&	$\leq 11$&	$\leq 12$&	$\leq 13$&	$\leq 14$&	$\leq 15$ \\ \hline
\tl{Ks}&	knots&				249&		801&		2,977&		12,965&		59,937&		313,230 \\ \hline
\tl{D}&		$\Delta$&			(38)&		(250)&		(1,204)&	(7,326)&	(39,741)&	(236,326) \\ \hline
\tl{s}&		$\sigma_{LT}$&			(108)&		(356)&		(1,525)&	(7,736)&	(40,101)&	(230,592) \\ \hline
\tl{J}&		$J$&				(7)&		(70)&		(482)&		(3,434)&	(21,250)&	(138,591) \\ \hline
\tl{Kh}&	$\Kh$&				(6)&		(65)&		(452)&		(3,226)&	(19,754)&	(127,261) \\ \hline
\tl{H}&		$H$&				(2)&		(31)&		(222)&		(1,839)&	(11,251)&	(73,892) \\ \hline
\tl{V}&		$\Vol$&				(\s6)&		(\s25)&		(\s113)&	(\s1,012)&	(\s6,353)&	(\s43,607) \\ \hline
\tl{KhHV}&	$(\Kh,H,\Vol)$&			(\s0)&		(\s14)&		(\s84)&		(\s911)&	(\s5,917)&	(\s41,434) \\ \hline
\tl{r1}&	$(\Delta,\rho_1)$&		(0)&		(14)&		(95)&		(959)&		(6,253)&	(42,914) \\ \hline
\tl{r12}&	$(\Delta,\rho_1,\rho_2)$&	(0)&		(14)&		(84)&		(911)&		(5,926)&	(41,469) \\ \hline
\tl{r12KhHV}&	$(\rho_1,\rho_2,\Kh,H,\Vol)$&	(0)&		(\s14)&		(\s84)&		(\s911)&	(\s5,916)&	(\s41,432) \\ \hline
\rowcolor{yellow}
\tl{Th}&	$\Theta$&			(0)&		(3)&		(19)&		(194)&		(1,118)&	(6,758) \\ \hline
\tl{Thr2}&	$(\Theta,\rho_2)$&		(0)&		(3)&		(10)&		(169)&		(982)&		(6,341) \\ \hline
\tl{Ths}&	$(\Theta,\sigma_{LT})$&		(0)&		(3)&		(19)&		(194)&		(1,118)&	(6,758) \\ \hline
\tl{ThKh}&	$(\Theta,\Kh)$&			(0)&		(3)&		(18)&		(185)&		(1,062)&	(6,555) \\ \hline
\tl{ThH}&	$(\Theta,H)$&			(0)&		(3)&		(18)&		(185)&		(1,064)&	(6,563) \\ \hline
\tl{ThV}&	$(\Theta,\Vol)$&		(0)&		(\s3)&		(\s10)&		(\s169)&	(\s973)&	(\s6,308) \\ \hline
\tl{Thr2KhHV}&	$(\Theta,\rho_2,\Kh,H,\Vol)$&	(0)&		(\s3)& 		(\s10)&		(\s169)&	(\s972)&	(\s6,304) \\ \hline
\end{tabular}\end{center}}
\caption{
  The separation powers of some knot invariants and combinations of knot
  invariants (in lines \ref{tl:D}--\ref{tl:Thr2KhHV}, smaller numbers are
  better). The data in this table was assembled by \cite[Stats.nb]{Self}.
} \label{tab:Strong}
\end{table}
