The Existence of the Exponential Function: Difference between revisions

From Drorbn
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
Our hope is to "fix" the mistake <math>M_8</math> by replacing <math>e_7(x)</math> with <math>e_8(x)=e_7(x)+\epsilon_8(x)</math>, where <math>\epsilon_8(x)</math> is a degree 8 "correction", a homogeneous polynomial of degree 8 in <math>x</math> (well, in this simple case, just a multiple of <math>x^8</math>).
Our hope is to "fix" the mistake <math>M_8</math> by replacing <math>e_7(x)</math> with <math>e_8(x)=e_7(x)+\epsilon_8(x)</math>, where <math>\epsilon_8(x)</math> is a degree 8 "correction", a homogeneous polynomial of degree 8 in <math>x</math> (well, in this simple case, just a multiple of <math>x^8</math>).


So we substitute <math>e_8(x)=e_7(x)+\epsilon_8(x)</math> into <math>e(x+y)-e(x)e(y)</math> (a version of {{EqRef|Main}}), expand, and consider only the low degree terms - those below and including degree 8. The terms containing no <math>\epsilon_8</math>'s make a copy of the left hand side of {{EqRef|M}}. The terms linear in <math>\epsilon_8</math> are <math>\epsilon_8(x+y)</math>, <math>-e_7(x)\epsilon_8(y)</math> and <math>-\epsilon_8(x)e_7(y)</math>. Note that since the constant term of <math>e_7</math> is 1 and since we only care about degree 8, the last two terms can be replaced by <math>-\epsilon_8(y)</math> and <math>-\epsilon_8(x)</math>, respectively. Finally, we don't even need to look at terms higher than linear in <math>\epsilon_8</math>, for these have degree 16 or more, high in the stratosphere.
So we substitute <math>e_8(x)=e_7(x)+\epsilon_8(x)</math> into <math>e(x+y)-e(x)e(y)</math> (a version of {{EqRef|Main}}), expand, and consider only the low degree terms - those below and including degree 8. The terms containing no <math>\epsilon_8</math>'s make a copy of the left hand side of {{EqRef|M}}. The terms linear in <math>\epsilon_8</math> are <math>\epsilon_8(x+y)</math>, <math>-e_7(x)\epsilon_8(y)</math> and <math>-\epsilon_8(x)e_7(y)</math>. Note that since the constant term of <math>e_7</math> is 1 and since we only care about degree 8, the last two terms can be replaced by <math>-\epsilon_8(y)</math> and <math>-\epsilon_8(x)</math>, respectively. Finally, we don't even need to look at terms higher than linear in <math>\epsilon_8</math>, for these have degree 16 or more, high in the stratosphere. In summary we have

{{Equation*|<math>e_8(x+y)-e_8(x)e_8(y)=M_8(x,y)-\epsilon_8(y)+\epsilon_8(x+y)-\epsilon_8(x)</math>.}}

We define a "differential" <math>d:{\mathbb Q}[x]\to{\mathbb Q}[x,y]</math> by <math>(df)(x,y)=f(y)-f(x+y)+f(x)</math>, and the above equation becomes

{{Equation*|<math>e_8(x+y)-e_8(x)e_8(y)=M_8(x,y)-(d\epsilon_8)(x,y)</math>.}}

To continue with our inductive construction we need to have that <math>e_8(x+y)-e_8(x)e_8(y)=0</math>. Hence the existence of the exponential function hinges upon our ability to find an <math>\epsilon_8</math> for which <math>M_8=d\epsilon_8</math>. In other words, we must show that <math>M_8</math> is in the image of <math>d</math>. This appears hopeless unless we learn more about <math>M_8</math>, for the domain space of <math>d</math> is much smaller than its target space and thus d cannot be surjective, and if <math>M_8</math> was in any sense "random", we simply wouldn't be able to find our correction term <math>\epsilon_8</math>. (It is worth noting that in some a priori sense the existence of an exponential function, a solution of <math>e(x+y)=e(x)e(y)</math>, is quite unlikely. For e must be an element of the relatively small space <math>{\mathbb Q}[[x]]</math> of power series in one variable, but the equation it is required to satisfy lives in the much bigger space <math>{\mathbb Q}[[x,y]]</math>. Thus in some sense we have more equations than unknowns and a solution is unlikely. How fortunate we are!)


==Computing the Homology==
==Computing the Homology==

Revision as of 23:40, 15 January 2007

Introduction

The purpose of this paperlet is to use some homological algebra in order to prove the existence of a power series (with coefficients in ) which satisfies the non-linear equation

[Main]

as well as the initial condition

[Init]
(higher order terms).

Alternative proofs of the existence of are of course available, including the explicit formula . Thus the value of this paperlet is not in the result it proves but rather in the allegorical story it tells: that there is a technique to solve functional equations such as [Main] using homology. There are plenty of other examples for the use of that technique, in which the equation replacing [Main] isn't as easy. Thus the exponential function seems to be the easiest illustration of a general principle and as such it is worthy of documenting.

Thus below we will pretend not to know the exponential function and/or its relationship with the differential equation .

The Scheme

We aim to construct and solve [Main] inductively, degree by degree. Equation [Init] gives in degrees 0 and 1, and the given formula for indeed solves [Main] in degrees 0 and 1. So booting the induction is no problem. Now assume we've found a degree 7 polynomial which solves [Main] up to and including degree 7, but at this stage of the construction, it may well fail to solve [Main] in degree 8. Thus modulo degrees 9 and up, we have

[M]
,

where is the "mistake for ", a certain homogeneous polynomial of degree 8 in the variables and .

Our hope is to "fix" the mistake by replacing with , where is a degree 8 "correction", a homogeneous polynomial of degree 8 in (well, in this simple case, just a multiple of ).

So we substitute into (a version of [Main]), expand, and consider only the low degree terms - those below and including degree 8. The terms containing no 's make a copy of the left hand side of [M]. The terms linear in are , and . Note that since the constant term of is 1 and since we only care about degree 8, the last two terms can be replaced by and , respectively. Finally, we don't even need to look at terms higher than linear in , for these have degree 16 or more, high in the stratosphere. In summary we have

.

We define a "differential" by , and the above equation becomes

.

To continue with our inductive construction we need to have that . Hence the existence of the exponential function hinges upon our ability to find an for which . In other words, we must show that is in the image of . This appears hopeless unless we learn more about , for the domain space of is much smaller than its target space and thus d cannot be surjective, and if was in any sense "random", we simply wouldn't be able to find our correction term . (It is worth noting that in some a priori sense the existence of an exponential function, a solution of , is quite unlikely. For e must be an element of the relatively small space of power series in one variable, but the equation it is required to satisfy lives in the much bigger space . Thus in some sense we have more equations than unknowns and a solution is unlikely. How fortunate we are!)

Computing the Homology